Different dimensions of durability in the luxury fashion industry: An analysis framework to conduct a literature review

被引:6
|
作者
Vanacker, Hester [1 ]
Lemieux, Andree-Anne [1 ]
Bonnier, Sophie [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Francais Mode, IFM Kering Sustainabil Chair, 34 Quai Austerlitz, F-75013 Paris, France
[2] Kering, Circular, 40 Rue Sevres, F-75007 Paris, France
关键词
Durability; Resilience; Emotional durability; Physical durability; Product lifecycle; Luxury fashion; SUPPLY CHAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134179
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As luxury fashion brands need to address the environmental impact of their products (both internally and externally), a framework to achieve a common and accessible language becomes paramount to avoid confusing claims. Tools, such as Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design, help companies assess and reduce the negative effects of their products on the environment; nonetheless, more work is needed. The desire to create durable goods is a direct reaction to the current throw-away culture perpetuated by planned obsolescence during the production phase of many fast-fashion brands. However, without a proper understanding of the term 'durability' and its different dimensions, a common language cannot be adopted by the various actors in the value chain (both up- and down-stream). Particularly, the characteristics of terms such as 'resilience' are mistakenly confused with those of 'durability.' Here, we review the literature from 2011 to date for determining clear definitions for both terms. A self-developed analysis framework was used for the systematic review of the literature, slightly adapting the methodology from an established process. The different levels (A, B, and C) of the framework reveal, in a structured manner, what a 'durable' or 'resilient' product is (at every stage of its lifecycle). We show that two dimensions should be considered for both concepts: 'intrinsic' (also referred to as 'physical' in the existing literature) and 'extrinsic' (often referred to as 'emotional'). Most authors fail to acknowledge the existence of both terms or use them inconsistently. Consequently, a thorough assessment of product durability and resilience is lacking, as studies have focused solely on one of the two dimensions or on a single lifecycle stage (most often the design phase) of a product. Thus, beyond its original aim, our model analysis framework can also help evaluate the environmental impact of luxury fashion products at each stage of their lifecycle.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Collaboration between academics and librarians: A literature review and framework for analysis
    Hue Thi Pham
    Tanner, Kerry
    LIBRARY REVIEW, 2014, 63 (1-2) : 15 - 45
  • [42] An analysis of BPM lifecycles: from a literature review to a framework proposal
    de Morais, Rinaldo Macedo
    Kazan, Samir
    Dallavalle de Padua, Silvia Ines
    Costa, Andre Lucirton
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (03) : 412 - 432
  • [43] A comprehensive framework and literature review of supplier selection under different purchasing strategies
    Saputro, Thomy Eko
    Figueira, Goncalo
    Almada-Lobo, Bernardo
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 167
  • [44] Return in Colombia from Its Dimensions of Analysis. A Systematic Literature Review
    Egea Jimenez, Carmen
    Diez Jimenez, Adriano
    Marquez Guerra, Jose Francisco
    REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS SOCIALES, 2022, (81) : 75 - 92
  • [45] Social and Demographic Dimensions of Sex Selection Technologies: Review and Analysis of the Research Literature
    Park, Sunjoo
    Bowen, William M.
    Steinbacher, Roberta
    BIODEMOGRAPHY AND SOCIAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 58 (01) : 62 - 74
  • [46] Integrated Sustainability Assessment Framework of Industry 4.0 from an Energy Systems Thinking Perspective: Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review
    Vallarta-Serrano, Stephany Isabel
    Santoyo-Castelazo, Edgar
    Santoyo, Edgar
    Garcia-Mandujano, Esther O.
    Vazquez-Sanchez, Holkan
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (14)
  • [47] Supply chain risks in Industry 4.0 environment: review and analysis framework
    Pandey, Shipra
    Singh, Rajesh K.
    Gunasekaran, Angappa
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2023, 34 (13) : 1275 - 1302
  • [48] A conceptual framework proposed through literature review to determine the dimensions of social transparency in global supply chains
    Raja, Preethi
    Mohan, Usha
    MANAGEMENT REVIEW QUARTERLY, 2024,
  • [49] The Core Dimensions of Integrated Care: A Literature Review to Support the Development of a Comprehensive Framework for Implementing Integrated Care
    Gonzalez-Ortiz, Laura G.
    Calciolari, Stefano
    Goodwin, Nick
    Stein, Viktoria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2018, 18 (03):
  • [50] Corporate Reputation in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis
    Hamidi, Saidatul Rahah
    Ismail, Maizatul Akmar
    Shuhidan, Shuhaida Mohamed
    Abd Kadir, Shamsiah
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):