Progress Feedback and the OQ-System: The Past and the Future

被引:100
作者
Lambert, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
progress monitoring and feedback; Outcome Questionnaire-45; clinical support tools; effects of feedback; prevention of treatment failure; CLINICAL SUPPORT TOOLS; PATIENT PROGRESS; TREATMENT FAILURE; OUTCOME QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RISK; THERAPISTS; SUPERVISION; INFORMATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1037/pst0000027
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A serious problem in routine clinical practice is clinician optimism about the benefit clients derive from the therapy that they offer compared to measured benefits. The consequence of seeing the silver lining is a failure to identify cases that, in the end, leave treatment worse-off than when they started or are simply unaffected. It has become clear that some methods of measuring, monitoring, and providing feedback to clinicians about client mental health status over the course of routine care improves treatment outcomes for clients at risk of treatment failure (Shimokawa, Lambert, & Smart, 2010) and thus is a remedy for therapist optimism by identifying cases at risk for poor outcomes. The current article presents research findings related to use of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 and Clinical Support Tools for this purpose. The necessary characteristics of feedback systems that work to benefit client's well-being are identified. In addition, suggestions for future research and use in routine care are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 390
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   The effect of implementing the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 feedback system in Norway: A multisite randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting [J].
Amble, Ingunn ;
Gude, Tore ;
Stubdal, Sven ;
Andersen, Bror Just ;
Wampold, Bruce E. .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2015, 25 (06) :669-677
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BERGIN GARFIELDS HDB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PREVENTION TREATMENT, DOI DOI 10.1037/12141-000
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, BERGIN GARFIELDS HDB
[5]   Clinical significance methods: A comparison of statistical techniques [J].
Bauer, S ;
Lambert, MJ ;
Nielsen, SL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2004, 82 (01) :60-70
[6]  
Beckstead D.J., 2003, BEHAV ANAL TODAY, V4, P86, DOI [10.1037/h0100015, DOI 10.1037/H0100015]
[7]  
Bergin A.E., 1971, Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis, P217
[8]   The Bilevel Structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 [J].
Bludworth, Jamie L. ;
Tracey, Terence J. G. ;
Glidden-Tracey, Cynthia .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2010, 22 (02) :350-355
[9]   A preliminary study of the effects of individual patient-level feedback in outpatient substance abuse treatment programs [J].
Crits-Christoph, Paul ;
Ring-Kurtz, Sarah ;
Hamilton, Jessica L. ;
Lambert, Michael J. ;
Gallop, Robert ;
McClure, Bridget ;
Kulaga, Agatha ;
Rotrosen, John .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2012, 42 (03) :301-309
[10]   The outcome questionnaire (OQ-45) in a Dutch population: A cross-cultural validation [J].
de Jong, Kim ;
Nugter, M. Annet ;
Polak, Marike G. ;
Wagenborg, Johannes E. A. ;
Spinhoven, Philip ;
Heiser, Willem J. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2007, 14 (04) :288-301