A cluster randomized controlled trial of the SoMe social media literacy body image and wellbeing program for adolescent boys and girls: Study protocol

被引:56
作者
Gordon, Chloe S. [1 ]
Rodgers, Rachel F. [2 ,3 ]
Slater, Amy E. [4 ]
McLean, Sian A. [1 ,5 ]
Jarman, Hannah K. [1 ]
Paxton, Susan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] CHRU, Lapeyronie Hosp, Dept Psychiat Emergency & Acute Care, Montpellier, France
[4] Univ West England, Ctr Appearance Res, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Victoria Univ, Footscray, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Body image; Social media; RCT-protocol; Adolescents; Eating disorders; Prevention; DUTCH EATING BEHAVIOR; REDUCE RISK-FACTORS; NETWORKING SITES; SOCIOCULTURAL ATTITUDES; PREVENTION PROGRAMS; QUESTIONNAIRE DEBQ; DISSATISFACTION; INTERVENTION; IMPACT; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Youth spend substantial time on social media, which can foster self-critical processes that increase risk of body dissatisfaction, disordered eating, and depressed mood. To date, there have been few investigations of interventions to decrease the negative impacts of social media engagement in adolescent boys and girls. This paper outlines the protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a four-lesson social media literacy program that was developed based on pilot results and aims to decrease body dissatisfaction, dietary restraint, and strategies to increase muscles. The RCT will be conducted with grades 7-8 students from Australian secondary schools. Using block randomization, grade levels within schools will be assigned to either the SoMe program (intervention) or health lessons as usual (control). Primary outcomes will be body satisfaction, dietary restraint, and strategies to increase muscles. Secondary outcomes will be self-esteem and depressed mood. Participants will complete assessments on four occasions - baseline, five-weeks post-baseline, and six- and 12-month post-baseline. Analyses will compare outcomes in the intervention compared to the control group. This study will be the first to implement a RCT design to evaluate the impact of a school-based social media literacy program designed to mitigate negative impacts of social media. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 37
页数:11
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MEDIALIT KIT LITERAC
[2]   EFFECTS OF INTERPRETATIONS OF TELEVISED ALCOHOL PORTRAYALS ON CHILDRENS ALCOHOL BELIEFS [J].
AUSTIN, EW ;
MEILI, HK .
JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING & ELECTRONIC MEDIA, 1994, 38 (04) :417-435
[3]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2018, HOUS US INF TECHN AU
[4]   Happy Being Me in the UK: A controlled evaluation of a school-based body image intervention with pre-adolescent children [J].
Bird, Emma L. ;
Halliwell, Emma ;
Diedrichs, Phillippa C. ;
Harcourt, Diana .
BODY IMAGE, 2013, 10 (03) :326-334
[5]   Body dissatisfaction: an overlooked public health concern [J].
Bucchianeri, Michaela M. ;
Neumark-Sztainer, Dianne .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC MENTAL HEALTH, 2014, 13 (02) :64-+
[6]  
Carlisle E., 2018, Youth survey report 2018
[7]   A systematic review of school-based alcohol and other drug prevention programs facilitated by computers or the Internet [J].
Champion, Katrina E. ;
Newton, Nicola C. ;
Barrett, Emma L. ;
Teesson, Maree .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2013, 32 (02) :115-123
[8]   Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls' engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media [J].
Chua, Trudy Hui Hui ;
Chang, Leanne .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 55 :190-197
[9]   Adolescents' Social Network Site Use, Peer Appearance-Related Feedback, and Body Dissatisfaction: Testing a Mediation Model [J].
de Vries, Dian A. ;
Peter, Jochen ;
de Graaf, Hanneke ;
Nikken, Peter .
JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2016, 45 (01) :211-224
[10]   Facebook and self-perception: Individual susceptibility to negative social comparison on Facebook [J].
de Vries, Dian A. ;
Kuhne, Rinaldo .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 86 :217-221