Psychopolitics and power in contemporary political thought

被引：4
作者：
Ortiz De Landazuri, Manuel Cruz [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Navarra, Dept Philosophy, Edificio Bibliotecas,Campus Univ, Pamplona 31009, Navarra, Spain
来源：
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL POWER | 2019年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词：
biopolitics; Foucault; Han; positivity; Stiegler;
D O I：
10.1080/2158379X.2019.1573512
中图分类号：
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号：
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要：
In this paper I compare the psychopolitical account given by Byung-Chul Han and Stiegler with the Foucauldian biopolitical framework. Taking into account Deleuze's and Baudrillard's remarks on the new society, Stiegler proposes to use the term psycho-power to complete Foucault's model. Byung-Chul Han has suggested that we are in a psychopolitical age that goes far beyond the biopolitical account. This analysis is linked to Bauman's work on liquid modernity, and to a reconceptualization of power.
引用
收藏
页码：4 / 15
页数：12
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Agamben G., 1998, HOMO SACER SOUVEREIG
  • [2] Alter Adam., 2017, IRRESISTIBLE RISE AD
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, The burnout society, translated by Erik Butler
  • [4] Arendt H., 1970, On Violence
  • [5] Baudrillard J., 1994, SIMULACRA SIMULATION
  • [6] Baudrillard Jean., 2005, The Intelligence of Evil or the Lucidity Pact
  • [7] Bauman Z., 2005, LIQUID LIFE
  • [8] Bauman Zygmunt., 2000, LIQUID MODERNITY, DOI DOI 10.1590/S0034-75902002000100010
  • [9] Dawkins R., 1989, The Selfish Gene, V2nd ed.
  • [10] Deleuze Gilles., 1995, NEGOTIATIONS 1972 19
123