Psychopolitics and power in contemporary political thought

被引：4

作者：

Ortiz De Landazuri, Manuel Cruz ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Navarra, Dept Philosophy, Edificio Bibliotecas,Campus Univ, Pamplona 31009, Navarra, Spain

来源：

JOURNAL OF POLITICAL POWER | 2019年 / 12卷 / 01期

关键词：

biopolitics; Foucault; Han; positivity; Stiegler;

D O I：

10.1080/2158379X.2019.1573512

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

In this paper I compare the psychopolitical account given by Byung-Chul Han and Stiegler with the Foucauldian biopolitical framework. Taking into account Deleuze's and Baudrillard's remarks on the new society, Stiegler proposes to use the term psycho-power to complete Foucault's model. Byung-Chul Han has suggested that we are in a psychopolitical age that goes far beyond the biopolitical account. This analysis is linked to Bauman's work on liquid modernity, and to a reconceptualization of power.

引用

页码：4 / 15

页数：12

共 26 条

[1]

Agamben G., 1998, HOMO SACER SOUVEREIG

[2]

Alter Adam., 2017, IRRESISTIBLE RISE AD

[3]

[Anonymous], 2015, The burnout society, translated by Erik Butler

[4]

Arendt H., 1970, On Violence

[5]

Baudrillard J., 1994, SIMULACRA SIMULATION

[6]

Baudrillard Jean., 2005, The Intelligence of Evil or the Lucidity Pact

[7]

Bauman Z., 2005, LIQUID LIFE

[8]

Bauman Zygmunt., 2000, LIQUID MODERNITY, DOI DOI 10.1590/S0034-75902002000100010

[9]

Dawkins R., 1989, The Selfish Gene, V2nd ed.

[10]

Deleuze Gilles., 1995, NEGOTIATIONS 1972 19

← 1 2 3 →