Low-potency oestrogen and risk of endometrial cancer:: a case-control study

被引:130
作者
Weiderpass, E
Baron, JA
Adami, HO
Magnusson, C
Lindgren, A
Bergström, R
Correia, N
Persson, I
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dartmouth Med Sch, Hanover, NH 03756 USA
[3] Falun Hosp, Dept Pathol, Falun, Sweden
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Harvard Ctr Canc Prevent, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10233-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Urogenital symptoms are common among postmenopausal women. Such symptoms may be alleviated by low-potency oestrogen formulations administered orally or vaginally. Although low-potency oestrogen formulations are assumed to have few, if any, adverse effects on the endometrium, risk of endometrial neoplasia has not been quantified. Methods. In a nationwide population-based case-control study in Sweden of endometrial cancer among postmenopausal women, we obtained detailed information on hormone replacement from 789 cases of endometrial cancer and 3368 population controls. In a histopathological review, 80 cases were reclassified as having endometrial atypical hyperplasia. Odds ratios and 95% Cl were calculated with unconditional logistic regression. Findings. After multivariate adjustment, oral use of oestriol 1-2 mg daily increased the relative risk of endometrial cancer and endometrial atypical hyperplasia: the odds ratios for at least 5 years of use compared with never use were 3.0 (95% Cl 2.0-4.4) and 8.3 (4.0-17.4), respectively. The association was stronger for well-differentiated cancers and those with limited invasion. The excess relative risk was lost rapidly after cessation of treatment. Only weak associations were observed between vaginal application of low-potency oestrogen formulations and relative risk of endometrial neoplasia. Interpretation. Oral, but not vaginal, treatment with low-potency oestrogen formulations increases the relative risk of endometrial neoplasia. Thus close surveillance of patients is needed, and addition of a progestagen should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:1824 / 1828
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Barrett-Connor E, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P457
  • [2] BORGLIN N E, 1959, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, V38, P157
  • [3] LACK OF ESTROGENIC POTENTIAL OF PROGESTERONE OR 19-NOR-PROGESTERONE-DERIVED PROGESTINS AS OPPOSED TO TESTOSTERONE OR 19-NOR-TESTOSTERONE DERIVATIVES ON ENDOMETRIAL ISHIKAWA CELLS
    BOTELLA, J
    DURANTI, E
    VIADER, V
    DUC, I
    DELANSORNE, R
    PARIS, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 55 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [4] Replens versus dienoestrol cream in the symptomatic treatment of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women
    Bygdeman, M
    Swahn, ML
    [J]. MATURITAS, 1996, 23 (03) : 259 - 263
  • [5] Low dose oestrogen prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infections in elderly women
    Cardozo, L
    Benness, C
    Abbott, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (04): : 403 - 407
  • [6] NUCLEAR BINDING AND RETENTION OF RECEPTOR ESTROGEN COMPLEX - RELATION TO AGONISTIC AND ANTAGONISTIC PROPERTIES OF ESTRIOL
    CLARK, JH
    PASZKO, Z
    PECK, EJ
    [J]. ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1977, 100 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [7] ENDOMETRIAL EFFECT OF ORAL ESTRIOL TREATMENT IN POST-MENOPAUSAL WOMEN
    ENGLUND, DE
    JOHANSSON, EDB
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1980, 59 (05) : 449 - 451
  • [8] ESTRIOL - A WEAK ESTROGEN OR A DIFFERENT HORMONE
    ESPOSITO, G
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1991, 5 (02) : 131 - 153
  • [9] Low-dose esterified estrogen therapy - Effects on bone, plasma estradiol concentrations, endometrium, and lipid levels
    Genant, HK
    Lucas, J
    Weiss, S
    Akin, M
    Emkey, R
    McNaneyFlint, H
    Downs, R
    Mortola, J
    Watts, N
    Yang, HM
    Banav, N
    Brennan, JJ
    Nolan, JC
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 157 (22) : 2609 - 2615
  • [10] Grady D, 1996, CANC EPIDEMIOLOGY PR, P1058