Preoperative MRI sphincter morphology and anal manometry: can they be markers of functional outcome following anterior resection for rectal cancer?

被引:14
|
作者
How, P. [1 ]
Evans, J. [2 ]
Moran, B. [3 ]
Swift, I. [2 ]
Brown, G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Pelican Canc Fdn, Basingstoke RG24 9NN, Hants, England
[2] Mayday Univ Hosp, Croydon Hlth Serv, Croydon, Surrey, England
[3] N Hampshire Hosp, Basingstoke, Hants, England
[4] Royal Marsden Hosp, Sutton, Surrey, England
关键词
Rectal cancer; anterior resection; functional outcome; MRI; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FECAL INCONTINENCE; AFFECTS CONTINENCE; SURGERY; ANASTOMOSIS; CARCINOMA; ATROPHY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02942.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Good functional outcome following anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer is an important clinical goal, but its prediction has proven difficult. Assessments such as anal manometry have been advocated as a potential tool but functional anatomy as depicted on MRI has not been investigated. This study looked at whether sphincter complex measurements recorded from preoperative staging MRIs and preoperative anal manometry have any correlation with functional outcome. Method Consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma underwent preoperative manometric assessment and MRI staging. MRIs were assessed with regard to anorectal angle, puborectalis thickness, canal length and external and internal anal sphincter thickness. Functional outcome was categorized into three groups according to the number of adverse postoperative symptoms (frequency, urgency, leakage, diarrhoea, use of pads, use of antidiarrhoeal medication): 0, 1 and =2. This was evaluated 1 year following surgery and 6 months following stoma reversal where applicable. Univariate analysis of an ordinal regression model was performed with significance at the 5% level. Results Thirty patients were assessed. No single preoperative manometric parameter proved significant (P > 0.05). Only puborectalis thickness showed a significant (P = 0.01) relationship with the number of adverse symptoms suffered postoperatively. On receiver operating characteristics analysis, a cut-off value of 3.5 mm gave an optimal sensitivity of 0.5 (95% CI, 0.170.83) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.640.96). Conclusions Measurements of the puborectalis thickness on preoperative staging MRIs for rectal cancer may help predict functional outcome following AR. Prospective assessment of larger numbers with a fully validated continence score are required to evaluate these findings further.
引用
收藏
页码:E339 / E345
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] Comparative analysis of late functional outcome following preoperative radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery or surgery alone in rectal cancer
    Pietro Contin
    Yakup Kulu
    Thomas Bruckner
    Martin Sturm
    Thilo Welsch
    Beat P. Müller-Stich
    Johannes Huber
    Markus W. Büchler
    Alexis Ulrich
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014, 29 : 165 - 175
  • [22] Colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection with upper sphincter excision for low-lying rectal cancer
    Jae-Gahb Park
    Min Ro Lee
    Seok-Byung Lim
    Chang Won Hong
    Sang Nam Yoon
    Sung-Bum Kang
    Seung Chul Heo
    Seung-Yong Jeong
    Kyu Joo Park
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005, (17) : 2570 - 2573
  • [23] Colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection with upper sphincter excision for low-lying rectal cancer
    Park, Jae-Gahb
    Lee, Min Ro
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Hong, Chang Won
    Yoon, Sang Nam
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    Heo, Seung Chul
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    Park, Kyu Joo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 11 (17) : 2570 - 2573
  • [24] Level of vascular tie and its effect on functional outcome 2 years after anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Hultberg, D. Kverneng
    Afshar, A. A.
    Rutegard, J.
    Lange, M.
    Haapamaki, M. M.
    Matthiessen, P.
    Rutegard, M.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 19 (11) : 987 - 995
  • [25] Pelvic dimensions on preoperative imaging can identify poor-quality resections after laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid- and low rectal cancer
    Johnny Chau
    Joshua Solomon
    A. Sender Liberman
    Patrick Charlebois
    Barry Stein
    Lawrence Lee
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 4609 - 4615
  • [26] Pelvic dimensions on preoperative imaging can identify poor-quality resections after laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid- and low rectal cancer
    Chau, Johnny
    Solomon, Joshua
    Liberman, A. Sender
    Charlebois, Patrick
    Stein, Barry
    Lee, Lawrence
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (10): : 4609 - 4615
  • [27] Long-term functional outcome of colonic J-pouch reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Hida, J
    Yoshifuji, T
    Okuno, K
    Matsuzaki, T
    Uchida, T
    Ishimaru, E
    Tokoro, T
    Yasutomi, M
    Shiozaki, H
    SURGERY TODAY, 2006, 36 (05) : 441 - 449
  • [28] Long-Term Functional Outcome of Colonic J-pouch Reconstruction After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Jin-ichi Hida
    Takehito Yoshifuji
    Kiyotaka Okuno
    Tomohiko Matsuzaki
    Toshihiro Uchida
    Eizaburou Ishimaru
    Tadao Tokoro
    Masayuki Yasutomi
    Hitoshi Shiozaki
    Surgery Today, 2006, 36 : 441 - 449
  • [29] Oncologic Outcomes After Radical Surgery Following Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer: Abdominoperineal Resection Versus Sphincter-Preserving Procedure
    Kim, Jin Soo
    Hur, Hyuk
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    Kim, Young Wan
    Cho, Sun Yeon
    Kim, Jeong Yeon
    Min, Byung Soh
    Ahn, Joong Bae
    Keum, Ki Chang
    Kim, Hoguen
    Sohn, Seung Kook
    Cho, Chang Hwan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) : 1266 - 1273
  • [30] Oncologic Outcomes After Radical Surgery Following Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer: Abdominoperineal Resection Versus Sphincter-Preserving Procedure
    Jin Soo Kim
    Hyuk Hur
    Nam Kyu Kim
    Young Wan Kim
    Sun Yeon Cho
    Jeong Yeon Kim
    Byung Soh Min
    Joong Bae Ahn
    Ki Chang Keum
    Hoguen Kim
    Seung Kook Sohn
    Chang Hwan Cho
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2009, 16 : 1266 - 1273