Achieving the SDGs: Evaluating indicators to be used to benchmark and monitor progress towards creating healthy and sustainable cities

被引:94
作者
Giles-Corti, Billie [1 ,2 ]
Lowe, Melanie [3 ]
Arundel, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NHMRC Ctr Res Excellence Hlth Liveable Communitie, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] RMIT Univ, Hlth Liveable Cities Grp, Ctr Urban Res, Bldg 15,Level 3,Room 12,124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[3] Australian Catholic Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Built environment; Indicators; Policy; Review; Social determinants of health; Urban; Liveability; Integrated planning; Sustainable development; Smart Growth; Sustainable Development Goals; Health policy; Climate change; Global health; Healthy people programs/methods; Health Policy; Health status indicators; Cities; City planning; methods; Urbanization/trends; POPULATION HEALTH; LAND-USE; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2016, the World Health Organization declared that Health is one of the most effective markers of any city's successful sustainable development' (World Health Organisation, 2016). With estimates that around 6.7 billion people will live in cities by 2050, 21st century city planning decisions will play a critical role in achieving the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They will determine the city structure and access to health-enhancing (or health-damaging) urban environments, and ultimately lifestyle choices that impact both individual and planetary health. Benchmarking, monitoring and evaluating city planning policies and interventions is therefore critical to optimise urban outcomes. In 2017, the UN adopted a global SDG indicator framework, calling for complementary national and regional indicators to be collected by member countries. UN Habitat has also developed an indicator action framework specifically for cities. This paper examined the extent to which the UN indicators will help cities evaluate their efforts to deliver sustainability and health outcomes. It identified inconsistencies between the two UN indicator frameworks. Many of the SDG indicators assess outcomes, rather than the comprehensive and integrated 'upstream' policies and interventions required to deliver outcomes on-the-ground. Conversely, the UN Habitat framework incorporates intervention indicators, but excludes health outcome indicators. A more comprehensive approach to benchmarking, monitoring and evaluating policies designed to achieve healthy and sustainable cities and assessing spatial inequities is proposed. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 590
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, GLOBAL REPORT URBAN
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, DOI DOI 10.4054/DEMRES.2005.12.9
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Hidden Cities: unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, LIV NEIGHB W AUSTR G
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, Report of the Secretary-General on Conflict-Related Sexual Violence
  • [6] [Anonymous], VANC DECL HUM SETTL
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2014, World Health Statistics 2014
  • [8] Arundel J., 2017, Creating Liveable Cities in Australia: Mapping Urban Policy Implementation and EvidenceBased National Liveability Indicators
  • [9] Urban liveability: Emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health
    Badland, Hannah
    Whitzman, Carolyn
    Lowe, Melanie
    Davern, Melanie
    Aye, Lu
    Butterworth, Iain
    Hes, Dominique
    Giles-Corti, Billie
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2014, 111 : 64 - 73
  • [10] Urban Planning for Healthy Cities A Review of the Progress of the European Healthy Cities Programme
    Barton, Hugh
    Grant, Marcus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2013, 90 : S129 - S141