Very important, yet very neglected: Where do local communities stand when examining social sustainability in major construction projects?

被引:44
作者
Di Maddaloni, Francesco [1 ]
Sabini, Luca [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Civil Engn, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, England
关键词
Social Sustainability; Major Construction Projects; Stakeholder Inclusion; Local Communities; Means -Ends Decoupling; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS; MIXED METHODS; ENGAGEMENT; PROCUREMENT; PROTEST; MEGAPROJECTS; PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; RETHINKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Major construction projects are characterized by a heterogeneous audience of stakeholders who can create severe reputational risk to project organizations when not properly addressed. The inclusion and support that project organizations devote to local communities form a crucial part of a project's delivery and social sustainability considerations, yet this has only recently attracted attention in project studies. To address social sustainability, project managers should reinforce accountability and the inclusion of 'new voices' in the project decision-making process. Through mixed-methods research, this paper contributes to the project stakeholder engagement discourse and normative stance of stakeholder theory concerning the role of local communities and examines the ways in which inclusion can provide a response to the sustainability challenges of major projects. Findings suggest means-ends decoupling situations where current project management practices towards communities' engagement are weakly linked to their goals and induced by convergent pressures and reactive mechanisms, thus preventing an inclusive decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 797
页数:20
相关论文
共 126 条
[51]  
Forthcoming Sabini L., 2023, RES HDB COMPLEX PROJ
[52]  
Freeman R.E., 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly, V4, P409, DOI [10.2307/3857340, DOI 10.2307/3857340]
[53]  
Freeman R.Edward., 2007, Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success
[54]   MEGAPROJECT PERFORMANCE, VALUE CREATION, AND VALUE DISTRIBUTION: AN ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE PERSPECTIVE [J].
Gil, Nuno ;
Fu, Yongcheng .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT DISCOVERIES, 2022, 8 (02) :224-251
[55]   Thematic Analysis [J].
Glisczinski, Dan .
JOURNAL OF TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION, 2018, 16 (03) :175-175
[56]  
Global Infrastructure Hub, 2021, WHAT IS PATH NET ZER
[57]   Decoupling Among CSR Policies, Programs, and Impacts: An Empirical Study [J].
Graafland, Johan ;
Smid, Hugo .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2019, 58 (02) :231-267
[58]   Narrative policy analysis and the integration of public involvement in decision making [J].
Hampton, Greg .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2009, 42 (03) :227-242
[59]  
Huemann M., 2016, Rethink! Project stakeholder management
[60]   Projects to create the future: Managing projects meets sustainable development [J].
Huemann, Martina ;
Silvius, Gilbert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (06) :1066-1070