Very important, yet very neglected: Where do local communities stand when examining social sustainability in major construction projects?

被引:44
作者
Di Maddaloni, Francesco [1 ]
Sabini, Luca [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Civil Engn, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, England
关键词
Social Sustainability; Major Construction Projects; Stakeholder Inclusion; Local Communities; Means -Ends Decoupling; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS; MIXED METHODS; ENGAGEMENT; PROCUREMENT; PROTEST; MEGAPROJECTS; PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; RETHINKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Major construction projects are characterized by a heterogeneous audience of stakeholders who can create severe reputational risk to project organizations when not properly addressed. The inclusion and support that project organizations devote to local communities form a crucial part of a project's delivery and social sustainability considerations, yet this has only recently attracted attention in project studies. To address social sustainability, project managers should reinforce accountability and the inclusion of 'new voices' in the project decision-making process. Through mixed-methods research, this paper contributes to the project stakeholder engagement discourse and normative stance of stakeholder theory concerning the role of local communities and examines the ways in which inclusion can provide a response to the sustainability challenges of major projects. Findings suggest means-ends decoupling situations where current project management practices towards communities' engagement are weakly linked to their goals and induced by convergent pressures and reactive mechanisms, thus preventing an inclusive decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 797
页数:20
相关论文
共 126 条
[41]   Enhancing stakeholder practice: a particularized exploration of community [J].
Dunham, L ;
Freeman, RE ;
Liedtka, J .
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2006, 16 (01) :23-42
[42]   Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action [J].
Eesley, Charles ;
Lenox, Michael J. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (08) :765-781
[43]  
Elkington J., 1997, ENV MANAGEMENT READI, P2, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_465
[44]   Advancing project stakeholder analysis by the concept 'shadows of the context' [J].
Eskerod, Pernille ;
Larsen, Tina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 36 (01) :161-169
[45]   Project Stakeholder Management-Past and Present [J].
Eskerod, Pernille ;
Huemann, Martina ;
Savage, Grant .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 46 (06) :6-14
[46]   Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say [J].
Eskerod, Pernille ;
Huemann, Martina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2013, 6 (01) :36-+
[47]  
European Union, 2014, OFFICIAL J EURPOEAN
[48]   A methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management-Application to infrastructure projects in Spain [J].
Fernandez-Sanchez, Gonzalo ;
Rodriguez-Lopez, Fernando .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2010, 10 (06) :1193-1201
[49]  
Fiss PC, 2004, ADMIN SCI QUART, V49, P501
[50]   What You Should Know About Megaprojects and Why: An Overview [J].
Flyvbjerg, Bent .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 45 (02) :6-19