National-scale assessment of ecological content in the world's largest land management framework

Meeting the diverse sustainability targets of modern society has led to the development of national-level management frameworks meant to guide resource management actions and conservation funding decisions. In U.S. rangelands, state-and-transition models have been developed within the Ecological Site Description (ESD) Database as an application of alternative state theory and to move the discipline toward a more dynamic platform for resource management. After 15 years of development, and with government-mandated collaboration among federal agencies, these models are set to become one of the world's largest guiding frameworks for terrestrial ecosystem management. Yet, ESD state-and-ransition models are being marketed for broad-scale application without a national-level critique evaluating their strengths and limitations. In this article, we conduct a national assessment of ESDs with a central focus on evaluating the specific details of ESD state-and-transition models. Importantly, we are not evaluating the conceptual underpinnings of the state-and-transition management framework, but rather its application. Specifically, we (1) quantify and summarize the information presented in ESD state-and-ransition models; (2) determine whether ESDs fully meet U.S. Congress's goal of a nationally consistent system for defining, mapping, and interpreting ecological sites; (3) identify limitations and logical holes in ESD predictions; and (4) evaluate whether conservation funding priorities are consistent with output from ESDs. Our evaluation reveals multiple shortcomings in the application of the state-and-transition model concept within ESDs, primarily that they are highly subjective, inconsistent in design and application, focus on a single historical climax community, and overuse grazing as a driver of both ecological degradation and restoration. Considering that many of these limitations have been a consistent criticism of rangeland assessment procedures throughout the history of the discipline, state-and-transition models within ESDs will require major reconstruction beyond the current plans for revision if they are to meet society's demand for more effective management and utilization of rangeland resources. While ESDs were developed to link science and management in rangeland ecology, our assessment suggests well-intentioned management frameworks built upon expert opinion and qualitative inputs will not effectively shift ecosystem management from long-held practices rooted in community climax theory to modern scientific perspectives based on alternative state theory.