Development of a new technique to predict reverse osmosis fouling

被引:20
作者
Taheri, A. H. [1 ,2 ]
Sim, S. T. V. [1 ,2 ]
Sim, L. N. [1 ,2 ]
Chong, T. H. [1 ]
Krantz, W. B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fane, A. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, Singapore Membrane Technol Ctr, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[3] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
关键词
Feed Fouling Monitor (FFM); Ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry (UTDR); RO; UF; Colloidal fouling; Fouling prediction; TIME-DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY; ENHANCED CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; MFI-UF; CRITICAL FLUX; FILTRATION MECHANISMS; FOULANT DEPOSITION; RO DESALINATION; FEED WATER; MEMBRANES; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.040
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this paper RO colloidal fouling was predicted using an on-line Feed Fouling Monitor (FFM) combined with a monitor based On ultrasonic time domain retlectometry (UTDR) under constant flux filtration. The FFM incorporated the relevant cross-flow hydrodynamics and detected the development of foulant load and resistance from a continuous sample passing over a small UF membrane. A UF membrane was used in the FFM, rather than a RO membrane, because it was more sensitive to fouling resistance and this decreased monitoring time and increased accuracy. The UTDR was coupled to a RO membrane cell to monitor the rate of cake thickness increase, which is the required information for the estimation of cake-enhanced osmotic pressure (CEOP). A model was developed to predict fouling in RO using data from the two monitors and combined both the cake resistance and the CEOP effect due to cake formation. RO and FFM fouling experiments were performed at different constant fluxes using the same feed solutions (200 mg/l SiO2, 2000 mg/l NaCl) and the same cross-flow velocity (0.1 m/s). The results showed that higher fluxes caused an increased fouling rate for both RO and the FEM. The foulant layer thickness measured by UTDR in the RO experiments increased faster at higher applied fluxes and the estimated CEOP effect was also strongly influenced by the flux. The results show that the model, combined with the FFM and UTDR measurements, can provide a good estimation of the RO fouling profile over a range of applied fluxes. This study also underscores the importance of CEOP in contributing to the increase in transmembrane pressure due to colloidal fouling in RO of saline feeds. (C) 2013 Elsevier BY. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 22
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
ADHAM S., 2008, CROSS FLOW SAMPLER F
[2]   An investigation of concentration polarization phenomena in membrane filtration of colloidal silica suspensions by NMR micro-imaging [J].
Airey, D ;
Yao, S ;
Wu, J ;
Chen, V ;
Fane, AG ;
Pope, JM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1998, 145 (02) :145-158
[3]   Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membranes: A review [J].
Al-Amoudi, Ahmed Saleh .
DESALINATION, 2010, 259 (1-3) :1-10
[4]   SDI: is it a reliable fouling index? [J].
Alhadidi, A. ;
Kemperman, A. J. B. ;
Schippers, J. C. ;
Wessling, M. ;
van der Meer, W. G. J. .
DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2012, 42 (1-3) :43-48
[5]   Effect of testing conditions and filtration mechanisms on SDI [J].
Alhadidi, A. ;
Blankert, B. ;
Kemperman, A. J. B. ;
Schippers, J. C. ;
Wessling, M. ;
van der Meer, W. G. J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2011, 381 (1-2) :142-151
[6]   Enhancing permeate flux in a RO plant by controlling membrane fouling [J].
Amiri, M. C. ;
Samiei, M. .
DESALINATION, 2007, 207 (1-3) :361-369
[7]   MOTION OF A PARTICLE GENERATED BY CHEMICAL GRADIENTS .1. NON-ELECTROLYTES [J].
ANDERSON, JL ;
LOWELL, ME ;
PRIEVE, DC .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1982, 117 (APR) :107-121
[8]  
*ASTM, 1995, D41894195 ASTM
[9]   Critical and sustainable fluxes: Theory, experiments and applications [J].
Bacchin, P. ;
Aimar, P. ;
Field, R. W. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 281 (1-2) :42-69
[10]   Biofouling in membrane systems - A review [J].
Baker, JS ;
Dudley, LY .
DESALINATION, 1998, 118 (1-3) :81-89