An evaluation of diffraction peak profile analysis (DPPA) methods to study plastically deformed metals

被引:20
作者
Simm, T. H. [1 ,2 ]
Withers, P. J. [1 ]
da Fonseca, J. Quinta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Mat Sci Ctr, Grosvenor St, Manchester M1 7HS, Lancs, England
[2] Swansea Univ, Inst Struct Mat, Bay Campus, Swansea SA1 8EN, W Glam, Wales
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Warren-Averbach; Diffraction peak profile analysis; X-ray diffraction; Titanium; Stainless steel; Williamson-Hall; X-RAY-DIFFRACTION; LINE-BROADENING ANALYSIS; AUSTENITIC STAINLESS-STEEL; DEFORMATION MICROSTRUCTURES; DISLOCATION CONTRAST; CRYSTALLITE SIZE; ROOM-TEMPERATURE; VOIGT FUNCTION; IF STEEL; STRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.091
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A range of diffraction peak profile analysis (DPPA) techniques were used to determine details of themicrostructure of plastically deformed alloys. Four different alloys were deformed by uniaxial tension and compression to a range of strains. The methods we have considered include, the full-width, Williamson-Hall methods, Warren-Averbach methods, and van Berkum's alternative method. Different metals were chosen to understand the effect of the deformation microstructure and crystal structure, a nickel alloy, two stainless steel alloys and two titanium alloys. The dislocation density values found by Williamson-Hall and Warren-Averbach methods were found to be close to those expected from TEM results of similar metals. When using the Warren-Averbach methods the results suggest that systematic errors in the dislocation density are introduced by three main factors: (1) separation of instrumental broadening, (2) separation of size and strain broadening, and (3) separation of dislocation density and arrangement. Which suggests in many cases the simpler Williamson-Hall method may be preferable. The other main parameters that can be determined by DPPA are the crystal size and the dislocation arrangement. The work suggests that further investigation is needed to understand what use if any these parameters have for quantifying the deformed microstructure of plastically deformed metals. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 343
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [21] Evaluation of the Structural Deviation of Cu/Cu2O Nanocomposite Using the X-ray Diffraction Analysis Methods
    Nguyen Hoang Lam
    Smith, Ryan P.
    Le, Nam
    Chau Thi Thanh Thuy
    Tamboli, Mohaseen S.
    Tamboli, Asiya M.
    Alshehri, Sultan
    Ghoneim, Mohammed M.
    Nguyen Tam Nguyen Truong
    Jung, Jae Hak
    CRYSTALS, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [22] The microstructure of mechanically alloyed Al-Mg determined by X-ray diffraction peak profile analysis
    Gubicza, J
    Kassem, M
    Ribárik, G
    Ungár, T
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2004, 372 (1-2): : 115 - 122
  • [23] Characterization of Dislocation Rearrangement in FCC Metals during Work Hardening Using X-ray Diffraction Line-Profile Analysis
    Nakagawa, Koutarou
    Hayashi, Momoki
    Takano-Satoh, Kozue
    Matsunaga, Hirotaka
    Mori, Hiroyuki
    Maki, Kazunari
    Onuki, Yusuke
    Suzuki, Shigeru
    Sato, Shigeo
    QUANTUM BEAM SCIENCE, 2020, 4 (04)
  • [24] Dislocation structure and crystallite size distribution in lath martensite determined by X-ray diffraction peak profile analysis
    Nedjad, S. Hossein
    Gharabagh, M. -R. Movaghar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2008, 99 (11) : 1248 - 1255
  • [25] A Comprehensive Study on the Impact of Aluminum Doping on X-ray Diffraction Peak Profile Analysis, Structural, Morphological, and Optical Properties of ZnO Nanoparticles Synthesized by Sol-Gel Auto-Combustion
    Vishunumurthy, G.
    Bhaskar, Ankam
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, 2025, 54 (03) : 2146 - 2166
  • [26] Quantitative study of Portland cement hydration by X-ray diffraction/Rietveld analysis and independent methods
    Scrivener, KL
    Füllmann, A
    Gallucci, E
    Walenta, G
    Bermejo, E
    CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2004, 34 (09) : 1541 - 1547
  • [27] Reassessment of evaluation methods for the analysis of near-surface residual stress fields using energy-dispersive diffraction
    Klaus, Manuela
    Genzel, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, 2019, 52 (01) : 94 - 105
  • [28] X-ray diffraction analysis by Williamson-Hall, Halder-Wagner and size-strain plot methods of CdSe nanoparticles- a comparative study
    Nath, Debojyoti
    Singh, Fouran
    Das, Ratan
    MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2020, 239 (239)
  • [29] Comparative evaluation of line profile analysis and preferred orientation correction in determining crystallite shape of anatase with X-ray power diffraction profile
    Li, Taotao
    Zhang, Huiyun
    Liu, Yanlian
    Xue, Yong
    Yang, Fuqian
    MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION, 2024, 210
  • [30] X-ray diffraction line profile analysis: A microstructural study in polymorphic TiO2
    Santos-Aguilar, Pamela
    Contreras-Torres, Flavio F.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 13 : 420 - 427