Does China's Yangtze River Economic Belt policy impact on local ecosystem services?

被引:83
作者
Luo, Qiaoling [1 ]
Luo, Yanlong [1 ]
Zhou, Qingfeng [2 ,3 ]
Song, Yan [4 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Urban Design, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Key Lab Urban Planning & Decis Making, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Yangtze River Economic Belt; Ecosystem services; Spatiotemporal variation; Value; Policy; LAND-USE; FORESTS; BASIN; TEXAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.135
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ecological protection of the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) is one part of China's national strategy, and to identify the spatiotemporal variation of ecosystem service values (ESV) and examine the YREB policies performances can provide effective knowledge and supports for making ecological protection policies. In this paper, the ESV of YREB's 11 units were measured based on equivalent factor value method. Panal data and regression discontinuity model were used to discuss the impact of the ecological protection policies issued 2012 and 2014 on the ESVs. The results showed that: (1) From 2009 to 2016, the total ESVs of the YREB increased from 617.49 billion USD to 844.84 billion USD, showing a pattern of slow increase (2009-2012), substantial growth (2012-2014) and stability of high level (2014-2016). Forestland and water body were the key types of land to ecological protection. For the average of all measured years, the two lands accounted for 43.24% of total ecological land and provided 82.36% of total ESVs;(2) Generally, all the units were closely related to the ecological protection policy and were positively affected. In the first period (2009-2012), the ESVs of 11 units had three statuses: declined, kept steady and moderately increased. After strong policy implementation, all units rose sharply (2012-2014) and maintained a steady increase at a high level (2014-2016); (3) Ecological protection policies have a significant positive effect on the ESVs. The policy in 2012 suppressed the downward trend of ESVs increase and the policy in 2014 had a positive impact to increase ESVs. This study proved that possible to achieve a win-win situation of urban development and ecological environmental protection by implementing ecological protection policies. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 241
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does Technological Innovation Promote Green Development? A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Hu, Senlin
    Zeng, Gang
    Cao, Xianzhong
    Yuan, Huaxi
    Chen, Bing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (11)
  • [42] Sustainability under policy transitions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: Historical and the shared socio-economic pathways
    Bian, Hongyan
    Zhao, Yaxue
    Gao, Jie
    Wen, Shiya
    Sun, Jiaxuan
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 148
  • [43] Ecosystem Services and Their Driving Forces in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China
    Chen, Wanxu
    Chi, Guangqing
    Li, Jiangfeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (10)
  • [44] Mapping changes in the value of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Middle Reaches Megalopolis, China
    Zhang, Guanshi
    Zheng, Duo
    Xie, Long
    Zhang, Xiu
    Wu, Hongjuan
    Li, Sen
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 48
  • [45] Evaluating Ecosystem Services Incorporation in River Policy: A Multidimensional Framework Applied to China's River Chief System
    Liu, Yarui
    Xue, Xinghua
    Gilvear, David J.
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2025, 41 (01) : 190 - 210
  • [46] The Carbon Neutral Potential of Forests in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China
    Tian, Huiling
    Zhu, Jianhua
    Jian, Zunji
    Ou, Qiangxin
    He, Xiao
    Chen, Xinyun
    Li, Chenyu
    Li, Qi
    Liu, Huayan
    Huang, Guosheng
    Xiao, Wenfa
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (05):
  • [47] Evaluation of logistics and port connectivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China
    Deng, Ping
    Song, Lian
    Xiao, Ruiqi
    Huang, Chengfeng
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2022, 126 : 249 - 267
  • [48] Exploring the Driving Forces of Ecosystem Services in the Yangtze River Basin, China
    Wang, Zhenwei
    Mao, Jinjin
    Peng, Yelin
    Wu, Jiahui
    Wang, Xiaochun
    Su, Lilan
    LAND, 2025, 14 (02)
  • [49] Development of multidimensional water poverty in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Yuan, Liang
    Yang, Dongquan
    Wu, Xia
    He, Weijun
    Kong, Yang
    Ramsey, Thomas Stephen
    Degefu, Dagmawi Mulugeta
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 325
  • [50] Combined Impact of Socioeconomic Forces and Policy Implications: Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of the Ecosystem Services Value in Yangtze River Delta, China
    Chen, Sha
    Li, Guan
    Xu, Zhongguo
    Zhuo, Yuefei
    Wu, Cifang
    Ye, Yanmei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)