A methodology to assess habitat fragmentation effects through regional indexes: Illustration with forest biodiversity hotspots

被引:14
作者
Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrene [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Esnouf, Antoine [3 ,4 ]
Roux, Philippe [1 ,4 ]
Lopez-Ferber, Miguel [2 ,4 ]
Rosenbaum, Ralph K. [1 ,4 ]
Loiseau, Eleonore [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier SupAgro, ELSA PACT Ind Chair, ITAP,Irstea, Montpellier, France
[2] Ecole Mines Ales, Ctr LGEI, F-30319 Ales, France
[3] Montpellier SupAgro, LBE, INRA, F-11100 Narbonne, France
[4] ELSA Res Grp, F-34060 Montpellier, France
关键词
Landscape spatial configuration; Forest loss; Metapopulation capacity; Large-scale indexes; Biological conservation; Global maps; METAPOPULATION CAPACITY; LANDSCAPE; CONNECTIVITY; LIFE; IMPACTS; MODELS; BIRDS; INDICATORS; RESOLUTION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.068
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The fragmentation of natural environments is a critical issue involving major challenges for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management. Large-scale information on areas sensitive to fragmentation is needed to improve the effectiveness of planning efforts. One promising metric combining the landscape spatial configuration with species characteristics is the metapopulation capacity lambda, which can be used to rank different fragmented landscapes in terms of their capacity to support viable metapopulations. A methodology to globally derive a fragmentation metric based on metapopulation capacity, at appropriate and meaningful spatial scales for fragmentation mechanisms, was developed. To illustrate the applicability and interest of the methodology, worldwide regionalised fragmentation indexes, calculated with a dispersal distance of 1 km valid for a broad range of species, were provided for all forest ecoregions included in the biodiversity hotspots. Ecoregions were divided by a virtual grid and a statistical analysis of metapopulation capacity values calculated at the grid square scale was performed to obtain a Forest Fragmentation Potential FFP at three levels of spatial aggregation within the ecoregion (highly converted forest, entire forest, and the whole ecoregion). The results highlighted significant intra-and inter-ecoregions differences, showing great potential to extend the use of these indexes to land use planning and areas prioritisation for both ecological protection and restoration. The influence of the different parameters used in the proposed approach is discussed as well as the limitations of the main assumptions. One important result is that the derived methodology can be easily adapted to a large number of species, scales, or regions to improve the coverage of fragmentation indexes.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 551
页数:9
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, Living Planet Report 2016. Risk and resilience in a new era, P145
  • [3] The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes
    Atauri, JA
    de Lucio, JV
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2001, 16 (02) : 147 - 159
  • [4] Metapopulation capacity of evolving fluvial landscapes
    Bertuzzo, Enrico
    Rodriguez-Iturbe, Ignacio
    Rinaldo, Andrea
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (04) : 2696 - 2706
  • [5] Indicators of the impacts of habitat loss on connectivity and related conservation priorities: Do they change when habitat patches are defined at different scales?
    Blazquez-Cabrera, Sandra
    Bodin, Orjan
    Saura, Santiago
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 45 : 704 - 716
  • [6] Bontemps S., 2011, technical report, V136, P1
  • [7] Global patterns and predictors of bird species responses to forest fragmentation: Implications for ecosystem function and conservation
    Bregman, Tom P.
    Sekercioglu, Cagan H.
    Tobias, Joseph A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 169 : 372 - 383
  • [8] Global biodiversity conservation priorities
    Brooks, T. M.
    Mittermeier, R. A.
    da Fonseca, G. A. B.
    Gerlach, J.
    Hoffmann, M.
    Lamoreux, J. F.
    Mittermeier, C. G.
    Pilgrim, J. D.
    Rodrigues, A. S. L.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5783) : 58 - 61
  • [9] A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics
    Calabrese, JM
    Fagan, WF
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 2 (10) : 529 - 536
  • [10] CEPF, 2016, BIOD HOTSP