Electric sector capacity planning under uncertainty: Climate policy and natural gas in the US

被引:26
作者
Bistline, John E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Elect Power Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Steyer Taylor Ctr Energy Policy & Finance, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Electricity; Uncertainty; Stochastic programming; Climate policy; Risk management; EMISSIONS; METHANE; INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENTS; MITIGATION; CERTAINTY; FUTURE; PLANTS; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2015.07.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research investigates the dynamics of capacity planning and dispatch in the US electric power sector under a range of technological, economic, and policy-related uncertainties. Using a two-stage stochastic programming approach, model results suggest that the two most critical risks in the near-term planning process of the uncertainties considered here are natural gas prices and the stringency of climate policy. Stochastic strategies indicate that some near-term hedging from lower-cost wind and nuclear may occur but robustly demonstrate that delaying investment and waiting for more information can be optimal to avoid stranding capital-intensive assets. Hedging strategies protect against downside losses while retaining the option value of deferring irreversible commitments until more information is available about potentially lucrative market opportunities. These results are explained in terms of the optionality of investments in the electric power sector, leading to more general in-sights about uncertainty, learning, and irreversibility. The stochastic solution is especially valuable if decision-makers do not sufficiently account for the potential of climate constraints in future decades or if fuel price projections are outdated. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 251
页数:16
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [51] Infanger G., 1999, GAMS DECIS USERS GUI
  • [52] Infanger G., 1994, Planning under uncertainty: solving large-scale stochastic linear programs
  • [53] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Marcellus shale gas
    Jiang, Mohan
    Griffin, W. Michael
    Hendrickson, Chris
    Jaramillo, Paulina
    VanBriesen, Jeanne
    Venkatesh, Aranya
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 6 (03):
  • [54] Kahan D.M., 2012, HDB RISK THEORY EPIS, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1435_28
  • [55] Approaches for performing uncertainty analysis in large-scale energy/economic policy models
    Kann, A
    Weyant, JP
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2000, 5 (01) : 29 - 46
  • [56] Modelling of uncertainties and price elastic demands in energy-environment planning for India
    Kanudia, A
    Shukla, PR
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 26 (03): : 409 - 423
  • [57] Robust responses to climate change via stochastic MARKAL: The case of Quebec
    Kanudia, A
    Loulou, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 106 (01) : 15 - 30
  • [58] Advanced bottom-up modelling for national and regional energy planning in response to climate change
    Kanudia, A
    Loulou, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 1999, 12 (2-3) : 191 - 216
  • [59] Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field
    Karion, Anna
    Sweeney, Colm
    Petron, Gabrielle
    Frost, Gregory
    Hardesty, R. Michael
    Kofler, Jonathan
    Miller, Ben R.
    Newberger, Tim
    Wolter, Sonja
    Banta, Robert
    Brewer, Alan
    Dlugokencky, Ed
    Lang, Patricia
    Montzka, Stephen A.
    Schnell, Russell
    Tans, Pieter
    Trainer, Michael
    Zamora, Robert
    Conley, Stephen
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (16) : 4393 - 4397
  • [60] CERTAINTY EQUIVALENTS FOR 3-POINT DISCRETE-DISTRIBUTION APPROXIMATIONS
    KEEFER, DL
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1994, 40 (06) : 760 - 773