Electric sector capacity planning under uncertainty: Climate policy and natural gas in the US

被引:26
作者
Bistline, John E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Elect Power Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Steyer Taylor Ctr Energy Policy & Finance, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Electricity; Uncertainty; Stochastic programming; Climate policy; Risk management; EMISSIONS; METHANE; INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENTS; MITIGATION; CERTAINTY; FUTURE; PLANTS; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2015.07.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research investigates the dynamics of capacity planning and dispatch in the US electric power sector under a range of technological, economic, and policy-related uncertainties. Using a two-stage stochastic programming approach, model results suggest that the two most critical risks in the near-term planning process of the uncertainties considered here are natural gas prices and the stringency of climate policy. Stochastic strategies indicate that some near-term hedging from lower-cost wind and nuclear may occur but robustly demonstrate that delaying investment and waiting for more information can be optimal to avoid stranding capital-intensive assets. Hedging strategies protect against downside losses while retaining the option value of deferring irreversible commitments until more information is available about potentially lucrative market opportunities. These results are explained in terms of the optionality of investments in the electric power sector, leading to more general in-sights about uncertainty, learning, and irreversibility. The stochastic solution is especially valuable if decision-makers do not sufficiently account for the potential of climate constraints in future decades or if fuel price projections are outdated. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 251
页数:16
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [41] Hammitt JK, 1999, RISK ANAL, V19, P135, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00395.x
  • [42] Disconcerting learning on climate sensitivity and the uncertain future of uncertainty
    Hannart, Alexis
    Ghil, Michael
    Dufresne, Jean-Louis
    Naveau, Philippe
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 119 (3-4) : 585 - 601
  • [43] Electricity supply industry modelling for multiple objectives under demand growth uncertainty
    Heinrich, G.
    Howells, M.
    Basson, L.
    Petrie, J.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2007, 32 (11) : 2210 - 2229
  • [44] The market value of variable renewables The effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price
    Hirth, Lion
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 38 : 218 - 236
  • [45] Venting and leaking of methane from shale gas development: response to Cathles et al.
    Howarth, Robert W.
    Santoro, Renee
    Ingraffea, Anthony
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 113 (02) : 537 - 549
  • [46] Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations
    Howarth, Robert W.
    Santoro, Renee
    Ingraffea, Anthony
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2011, 106 (04) : 679 - 690
  • [47] Analysis of multi-pollutant policies for the US power sector under technology and policy uncertainty using MARKAL
    Hu, Ming-Che
    Hobbs, Benjamin F.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2010, 35 (12) : 5430 - 5442
  • [48] The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation
    Hultman, Nathan
    Rebois, Dylan
    Scholten, Michael
    Ramig, Christopher
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 6 (04):
  • [49] Hultman NE, 2007, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V41, P2088
  • [50] Huntington H., 2013, 26 EMF, V1