Estimation of hydraulic parameters from pumping tests in a multiaquifer system

被引:24
作者
Ha, Da [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Gang [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Haizuo [1 ,2 ]
Zeng, Chaofeng [3 ]
Zhang, Huihui [4 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Key Lab Coast Civil Struct Safety, Minist Educ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Hunan Prov Key Lab Geotech Engn Stabil Control &, Xiangtan 411201, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resources & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hydraulic parameter; Leaky aquifer; Pumping test; Optimal approach; EXTENDED KALMAN FILTER; AQUIFERS; EXCAVATION; FLOW; GROUNDWATER; RESPONSES; RECHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.undsp.2019.03.006
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The hydrogeologic conditions in Tianjin, China, are characterized by a system of multiple alternating aquifers and aquitards and a high groundwater level. Generally, the groundwater system to a depth of 70 m includes one phreatic aquifer and three semiconfined aquifers (AqI-AqIII). The distribution of aquifers varies greatly. Accurate estimates of aquifer parameters from pumping tests are essential in geotechnical engineering practice. In this study, the applicability of different models for estimating hydraulic parameters in a multiaquifer system is analyzed. To avoid errors in the graphic-analytical process and to enhance the efficiency and accuracy, a hybrid algorithm, called GALMA (a genetic algorithm (GA) combined with the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm), is used with the Neuman and Witherspoon model and ratio method. The estimated values in the second and third semiconfined aquifers (AqII and AqIII) from various solutions are compared with the measured data. Further validations based on the prediction of the drawdown values are performed via a three dimensional numerical simulation.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 222
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, MODFLOW-2005, the US Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model: the Ground-Water Flow Process
  • [2] Evaluation of methods for estimating aquifer hydraulic parameters
    Bateni, S. M.
    Mortazavi-Naeini, M.
    Ataie-Ashtiani, B.
    Jeng, D. S.
    Khanbilvardi, R.
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 28 : 541 - 549
  • [3] Batu V., 1998, Aquifer Hydraulics: A Comprehensive Guide to Hydrogeologic Data Analysis, V1
  • [4] Bear J., 2012, Hydraulics of groundwater
  • [5] Cooper H.H., 1946, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V27, P526, DOI [DOI 10.1029/TR027I004P00526, 10.1029/TR027i004p00526]
  • [6] WATER FROM LOW-PERMEABILITY SEDIMENTS AND LAND SUBSIDENCE
    DOMENICO, PA
    MIFFLIN, MD
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1965, 1 (04) : 563 - &
  • [7] Holland J. H., 1992, ADAPTATION NATURAL A
  • [8] Aquifer parameter identification using the extended Kalman filter
    Leng, CH
    Yeh, HD
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2003, 39 (03) : SBH91 - SBH916
  • [9] Comparison of three methods of hydrogeological parameter estimation in leaky aquifers using transient flow pumping tests
    Li, Peiyue
    Qian, Hui
    Wu, Jianhua
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (04) : 2293 - 2301
  • [10] Flow to a well in a five-layer system with application to the oxnard basin
    Li, Yanhua
    Neuman, Shlomo P.
    [J]. GROUND WATER, 2007, 45 (06) : 672 - 682