A virtual reality approach for usability assessment: case study on a wheelchair-mounted robot manipulator

被引:33
作者
Di Gironimo, G. [1 ]
Matrone, G. [1 ]
Tarallo, A. [1 ]
Trotta, M. [1 ]
Lanzotti, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, PRO I Res Grp, Naples, Italy
关键词
Participatory design; Virtual reality experiments; Assistive robotics; Usability index; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP);
D O I
10.1007/s00366-012-0274-x
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The aim of the paper is to address an innovative methodology for assessing the usability of a product. This methodology is particularly suitable for designing products that provide their main functions through their control interfaces. In particular, this case study relates to the usability assessment of two control devices for a wheelchair-mounted robot manipulator to assist physically disabled people. The study focuses on defining a synthetic usability index on the basis of two currently used methods: the multi criteria decision analysis and the Saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Several virtual reality (VR)-based experiments have been conducted, set up in accordance with a cross-array experimental plan, that adequately caters for both control and noise factors. Quantitative measures and subjective user evaluations have been collected to maximize the effectiveness, the efficiency and the satisfaction perceived by users while using the product. Compared to the literature on the subject, the proposed approach provides both more flexibility in defining quantitative indexes and more adequate results, even when involving only a small sample of users in the participatory design session. The use of VR technologies for the collection of the experimental data has been essential in terms of safety, costs and repeatability of the tests, as well as of the robustness with respect to noise factors.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 373
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]  
HILLMAN M, 1994, P ICORR 94, P211
[22]   Current practice in measuring usability:: Challenges to usability studies and research [J].
Hornbæk, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2006, 64 (02) :79-102
[23]   A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence [J].
Jaspers, Monique W. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 78 (05) :340-353
[24]  
Jolliffe I. T., 1986, PRINCIPAL COMPONENT, DOI DOI 10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9
[25]  
Kalawsky R. S., 1998, IEE DIGEST, V1998, p5/1, DOI DOI 10.1049/IC:19980654
[26]  
KANAI S, 2007, INTEGRATED ENV TESTI, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-73335-5
[27]   A methodology for developing a usability index of consumer electronic products [J].
Kim, Jongseo ;
Han, Sung H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2008, 38 (3-4) :333-345
[28]  
KUUTTI K, 2001, HICSS 01, V5, P5029
[29]  
LANZOTTI A, 2008, STAT INNOVATION, P27
[30]   Cognitive engineering methods as usability evaluation tools for medical equipment [J].
Liljegren, E ;
Osvalder, AL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2004, 34 (01) :49-62