Lessons in Leveraging Implementation: Rulemaking, Growth Models, and Policy Dynamics Under NCLB

被引:5
作者
Furgol, Katherine E. [1 ]
Helms, Lelia B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Lindquist Ctr 204, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
No Child Left Behind; policy implementation; growth models; rulemaking; stakeholders; policy dynamics; federal and state governance; NO CHILD LEFT; SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT; POLITICAL-CULTURE; EDUCATION; STATES; RULE; ACCOUNTABILITY; FAILURE; REFORM;
D O I
10.1177/0895904811417588
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Through a case study that highlights the role of rulemaking in the evolution of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), this article provides strategies for educators who seek both to influence policy outcomes and to understand the dynamics of policymaking. This study examines the regulatory processes for NCLB, specifically related to the adoption of growth models, at both the federal and state levels, augmenting the slim body of literature on rulemaking in educational policy. It focuses on rulemaking processes as they define and redirect the substance of policy, create ongoing opportunities for stakeholder participation, and influence, and tailor policies to the state and local settings in which delivery occurs. This article describes policy as cumulative, increasingly complex and multileveled. It recommends that stakeholders monitor and target federal and state rulemaking venues so as to influence and adapt legislative mandates to the specific contexts and demands of practice.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 812
页数:36
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ECS REP NAT STAT IMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, IMPLEMENTATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1984, American Federalism: A View from the States
[4]  
Biggs S., 2007, The practice of American public policymaking
[5]  
Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management, 2011, COM TOG RAIS ACH NEW
[6]   The role of nonsystem actors in the relationship between policy and practice: The case of reading instruction in California [J].
Coburn, CE .
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2005, 27 (01) :23-52
[7]   Assessing consensus: The promise and performance of negotiated rulemaking [J].
Coglianese, C .
DUKE LAW JOURNAL, 1997, 46 (06) :1255-1349
[8]  
Congressional Research Service, 2004, ED TEST IMPL ESEA TI
[9]  
Council of Administrators of Special Education, 2002, SUMM NCLB FED REG NO
[10]  
*CTR ED POL, 2003, CAP CLASSR STAT FED