Spatial differences of the supply of multiple ecosystem services and the environmental and land use factors affecting them

被引:51
作者
Pan, Ying [1 ]
Xu, Zengrang [1 ]
Wu, Junxi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services index; Ecosystem services tradeoffs; Land management; Loess plateau; Spatial heterogeneity; AGRICULTURE; TRADEOFFS; CONSERVATION; YIELDS; CHINA; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A practical knowledge of the amount or supply level of multiple ecosystem services is the key prerequisite for enhancing local ecological stability and securing the well-being of humanity. We studied the supplies of four ecosystem services: grain provisioning, meat provisioning, water conservation, and soil retention at the county level in the Jinghe watershed in northwestern China. The spatial differences of the supply of four ecosystem services were studied using two indices, the Total Ecosystem Services (TES) and Trade-Offs (TO) indices. Then, the environmental and land use factors affecting the spatial differences were also analyzed. The results show that large spatial differences exist in the supplies of multiple ecosystem services, in which the TES and TO indices varied by as much as six and 12 times from one area to another, respectively. Precipitation was the primary constraint on the total supply of multiple ecosystem services. However, environmental factors had little impact on the ecosystem service tradeoffs, although the type of land use had significant impacts. An increase in the spatial extent of grassland area resulted in reduced trade-offs and enhanced the supply of multiple ecosystem services. A spatial increase in farmland had opposite effects. This case study provides a new perspective on identifying where and how to enhance multiple ecosystem services. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E4 / E10
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[2]  
[Anonymous], AGR RES SERVICE USDA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MODIS DOC
[4]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404
[5]   Why large-scale afforestation efforts in China have failed to solve the desertification problem [J].
Cao, Shixiong .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (06) :1826-1831
[6]   Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management [J].
Egoh, Benis ;
Reyers, Belinda ;
Rouget, Mathieu ;
Richardson, David M. ;
Le Maitre, David C. ;
van Jaarsveld, Albert S. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 127 (1-2) :135-140
[7]   Hydrological consequences of eucalyptus afforestation in the argentine pampas -: art. no. W10409 [J].
Engel, V ;
Jobbágy, EG ;
Stieglitz, M ;
Williams, M ;
Jackson, RB .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2005, 41 (10) :W10409-1
[8]   Modeling soil erosion and its response to land-use change in hilly catchments of the Chinese Loess Plateau [J].
Feng, Xiaoming ;
Wang, Yafeng ;
Chen, Liding ;
Fu, Bojie ;
Bai, Gangshuan .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2010, 118 (3-4) :239-248
[9]  
Fischer G., 2012, Global agro-ecological zones (GAEZ v3. 0)-model documentation
[10]   Global consequences of land use [J].
Foley, JA ;
DeFries, R ;
Asner, GP ;
Barford, C ;
Bonan, G ;
Carpenter, SR ;
Chapin, FS ;
Coe, MT ;
Daily, GC ;
Gibbs, HK ;
Helkowski, JH ;
Holloway, T ;
Howard, EA ;
Kucharik, CJ ;
Monfreda, C ;
Patz, JA ;
Prentice, IC ;
Ramankutty, N ;
Snyder, PK .
SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5734) :570-574