A comprehensive preference-based optimization framework with application to high-lift aerodynamic design

被引:11
作者
Carrese, Robert [1 ]
Winarto, Hadi [1 ]
Li, Xiaodong [1 ]
Sobester, Andras [2 ]
Ebenezer, Samuel [3 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Aerosp Mech & Mfg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Program Dev Co LLC, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
high-lift aerodynamics; multiobjective optimization; data mining; preferences; Kriging; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; AIRFOIL DESIGN; PARTICLE SWARM; CONVERGENCE; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1080/0305215X.2011.637558
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
An integral component of transport aircraft design is the high-lift configuration, which can provide significant benefits in aircraft payload-carrying capacity. However, aerodynamic optimization of a high-lift configuration is a computationally challenging undertaking, due to the complex flow-field. The use of a designer-interactive multiobjective optimization framework is proposed, which identifies and exploits preferred regions of the Pareto frontier. Visual data mining tools are introduced to statistically extract information from the design space and confirm the relative influence of both variables and objectives to the preferred interests of the designer. The framework is assisted by the construction of time-adaptive Kriging models, which are cooperatively used with a high-fidelity Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solver. The successful integration of these design tools is facilitated through the specification of a reference point, which can ideally be based on an existing design configuration. The framework is demonstrated to perform efficiently for the present case-study within the imposed computational budget.
引用
收藏
页码:1209 / 1227
页数:19
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1975, Journal of Aircraft, DOI DOI 10.2514/3.59830
[2]   Swarm Heuristic for Identifying Preferred Solutions in Surrogate-Based Multi-Objective Engineering Design [J].
Carrese, Robert ;
Sobester, Andras ;
Winarto, Hadi ;
Li, Xiaodong .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2011, 49 (07) :1437-1449
[3]   Benefits of Incorporating Designer Preferences Within a Multi-Objective Airfoil Design Framework [J].
Carrese, Robert ;
Winarto, Hadi ;
Watmuff, Jon ;
Wickramasinghe, Upali K. .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2011, 48 (03) :832-844
[4]   The particle swarm - Explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space [J].
Clerc, M ;
Kennedy, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (01) :58-73
[5]  
Deb K, 2004, ADV INFO KNOW PROC, P105
[6]  
Deb K., 2001, Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
[7]  
Deb K, 2006, GECCO 2006: GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, VOL 1 AND 2, P635
[8]   An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization [J].
Fonseca, Carlos M. ;
Fleming, Peter J. .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 1995, 3 (01) :1-16
[9]   Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms - Part I: A unified formulation [J].
Fonseca, CM ;
Fleming, PJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1998, 28 (01) :26-37
[10]  
Forrester A., 2008, Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: a Practical Guide, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470770801