Development of key performance indicators for emergency departments in Ireland using an electronic modified-Delphi consensus approach

被引:42
作者
Wakai, Abel [1 ]
O'Sullivan, Ronan [2 ,3 ]
Staunton, Paul [4 ]
Walsh, Cathal [5 ]
Hickey, Fergal [6 ]
Plunkett, Patrick K. [7 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Div Populat Hlth Sci, Emergency Care Res Unit, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Our Ladys Childrens Hosp, Emergency Dept, Crumlin, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Dept Paediat, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Beaumont Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Dublin, Ireland
[5] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dept Stat, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Sligo Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Sligo, Ireland
[7] Trinity Coll Dublin, Fac Hlth Sci, St Jamess Hosp, Sch Med,Dept Emergency Med, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Delphi technique; emergency departments; emergency medicine; key performance indicators; performance indicators; QUALITY; CARE; IDENTIFY;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328351e5d8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this study was to develop a consensus among emergency medicine (EM) specialists working in Ireland for emergency department (ED) key performance indicators (KPIs). Methods The method employed was a three-round electronic modified-Delphi process. An online questionnaire with 54 potential KPIs was set up for round 1 of the Delphi process. The Delphi panel consisted of all registered EM specialists in Ireland. Each indicator on the questionnaire was rated using a five-point Likert-type rating scale. Agreement was defined as at least 70% of the responders rating an indicator as 'agree' or 'strongly agree' on the rating scale. Data were analysed using standard descriptive statistics. Data were also analysed as the mean of the Likert rating with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Sensitivity of the ratings was examined for robustness by bootstrapping the original sample. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 16.0. Results The response rates in rounds 1, 2 and 3 were 86, 88 and 88%, respectively. Ninety-seven potential indicators reached agreement after the three rounds. In the context of the Donabedian structure-process-outcome framework of performance indicators, 41 (42%) of the agreed indicators were structure indicators, 52 (54%) were process indicators and four (4%) were outcome indicators. Overall, the top-three highest rated indicators were: presence of a dedicated ED clinical information system (4.7; 95% CI 4.6-4.9), ED compliance with minimum design standards (4.7; 95% CI 4.5-4.8) and time from ED arrival to first ECG in suspected cardiac chest pain (4.7; 95% CI 4.5-4.9). The top-three highest rated indicators specific to clinical care of children in EDs were: time to administration of antibiotics in children with suspected bacterial meningitis (4.6; 95% CI 4.5-4.8), separate area available within EDs (seeing both adults and children) to assess children (4.4; 95% CI 4.2-4.6) and time to administration of analgesia in children with forearm fractures (4.4; 95% CI 4.2-4.7). Conclusion Employing a Delphi consensus process, it was possible to reach a consensus among EM specialists in Ireland on a suite of 97 KPIs for EDs. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 20:109-114 (c) 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 114
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GUID DEV KEY PERF IN
  • [2] [Anonymous], NATL I HLTH SCI RES
  • [3] A Delphi study to identify performance indicators for emergency medicine
    Beattie, E
    Mackway-Jones, K
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (01) : 47 - 50
  • [4] Consensus methods to identify a set of potential performance indicators for systems of emergency and urgent care
    Coleman, Patricia
    Nicholl, Jon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2010, 15 : 12 - 18
  • [5] Department of Health, A E CLIN QUAL IND IM
  • [6] EVALUATING QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE
    DONABEDIAN, A
    [J]. MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1966, 44 (03): : 166 - 206
  • [7] Are high-quality cardiac surgeons less likely to operate on high-risk patients compared to low-quality surgeons? Evidence from New York State
    Glance, Laurent G.
    Dick, Andrew
    Mukamel, Dana B.
    Li, Yue
    Osler, Turner M.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2008, 43 (01) : 300 - 312
  • [8] Graff L, 2002, ACAD EMERG MED, V9, P1091, DOI 10.1197/aemj.9.11.1091
  • [9] Development of measures of the quality of emergency department care for children using a structured panel process
    Guttmann, A
    Razzaq, A
    Lindsay, P
    Zagorski, B
    Anderson, GM
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2006, 118 (01) : 114 - 123
  • [10] Health Service Executive, 2007, EM DEP TASK FORC REP