Ergodic theory, interpretations of probability and the foundations of statistical mechanics

被引:14
作者
van Lith, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Hist & Fdn Sci, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN PHYSICS | 2001年 / 32B卷 / 04期
关键词
ergodic theory; statistical mechanics; stationarity; equilibrium; interpretation of probability;
D O I
10.1016/S1355-2198(01)00027-2
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
The traditional use of ergodic theory in the foundations of equilibrium statistical mechanics is that it provides a link between thermodynamic observables and microcanonical probabilities. First of all, the ergodic theorem demonstrates the equality of microcanonical phase averages and infinite time averages (albeit for a special class of systems, and up to a measure zero set of exceptions). Secondly, one argues that actual measurements of thermodynamic quantities yield time averaged quantities, since measurements take a long time. The combination of these two points is held to be an explanation why calculating microcanonical phase averages is a successful algorithm for predicting the values of thermodynamic observables. It is also well known that this account is problematic. This survey intends to show that ergodic theory nevertheless may have important roles to play, and it explores three other uses of ergodic: theory. Particular attention is paid, firstly, to the relevance of specific interpretations of probability, and secondly, to the way in which the concern with systems in thermal equilibrium is translated into probabilistic language. With respect to the latter point, it is argued that equilibrium should not be represented as a stationary probability distribution as is standardly done; instead, a weaker definition is presented. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd, All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 594
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, CONCEPT PROBABILITY
[2]   Why ergodic theory does not explain the success of equilibrium statistical mechanics [J].
Earman, J ;
Redei, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1996, 47 (01) :63-78
[3]  
Ehrenfest P., 1912, CONCEPTUAL FDN STAT
[4]  
JAYNES ET, 1967, DEL SEM FDN PHYS NEW, V1
[5]  
Khinchin A. I., 1949, MATH FDN STAT MECH
[6]  
LANFORD OE, 1973, SPRINGER LECT NOTES
[7]   MALAMENT AND ZABELL ON GIBBS PHASE AVERAGING - DISCUSSION [J].
LEEDS, S .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1989, 56 (02) :325-340
[8]   WHY GIBBS PHASE AVERAGES WORK - THE ROLE OF ERGODIC-THEORY [J].
MALAMENT, DB ;
ZABELL, SL .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1980, 47 (03) :339-349
[9]   STATISTICAL EXPLANATION AND ERGODIC THEORY [J].
SKLAR, L .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1973, 40 (02) :194-212
[10]  
SKLAR L, 1993, PHYSICS CHANCE PHILO