Working memory capacity and visual attention: Top-down and bottom-up guidance

被引:29
作者
Shipstead, Zach [1 ]
Harrison, Tyler L. [1 ]
Engle, Randall W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Working memory capacity; Visual attention; Selective attention; Flanker task; Bottom-up; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; SEARCH; TASK; COGNITION; CAPTURE; STORAGE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/17470218.2012.655698
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous studies have indicated that working memory capacity (WMC) is related to visual attention when selection of critical information must be made in the face of distraction. The present study examines whether WMC-related differences in flanker task performance might be decreased by displays that are designed to support bottom-up guidance of attention. Participants were required to respond to a centrally located target while ignoring a peripheral flanker. In one condition, bottom-up support was provided by embedding the target in a row of zeros. In another condition, the zeros were removed, thus emphasizing the role of top-down attention in selecting spatially defined information. It was found that the inclusion of zeros led to the elimination of WMC-related flanker effects. We conclude that bottom-up attentional guidance can attenuate the role of WMC in selective attention.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 407
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   ATTENTION - SOME THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
DEUTSCH, JA ;
DEUTSCH, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1963, 70 (01) :80-90
[2]   A selective review of selective attention research from the past century [J].
Driver, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 92 :53-78
[3]   VISUAL-SEARCH AND STIMULUS SIMILARITY [J].
DUNCAN, J ;
HUMPHREYS, GW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 96 (03) :433-458
[4]   EFFECTS OF NOISE LETTERS UPON IDENTIFICATION OF A TARGET LETTER IN A NONSEARCH TASK [J].
ERIKSEN, BA ;
ERIKSEN, CW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01) :143-149
[5]   Individual Differences in Recovery Time From Attentional Capture [J].
Fukuda, Keisuke ;
Vogel, Edward K. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (03) :361-368
[6]   Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture [J].
Fukuda, Keisuke ;
Vogel, Edward K. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (27) :8726-8733
[7]   Focusing the spotlight: Individual differences in visual attention control [J].
Heitz, Richard P. ;
Engle, Randall W. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2007, 136 (02) :217-240
[8]   Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference [J].
Kane, MJ ;
Engle, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2003, 132 (01) :47-70
[9]   PERCEPTUAL LOAD AS A NECESSARY CONDITION FOR SELECTIVE ATTENTION [J].
LAVIE, N .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (03) :451-468
[10]   On the efficiency of visual selective attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection [J].
Lavie, N ;
Cox, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 8 (05) :395-398