Access to transit? Validating local transit accessibility measures using transit ridership

被引:35
作者
Bree, Sarah [1 ]
Fuller, Daniel [2 ]
Diab, Ehab [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog & Planning, 117 Sci Pl, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C8, Canada
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Sch Human Kinet & Recreat Phys Educ Bldg, St John, NF A1C 5S7, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Transit accessibility; Local accessibility; Fare box data; Ridership; Spatial lag model (SLM); Spatial error model (SEM); TRANSPORT; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Local transit accessibility measures are important tools used by planners to understand the effects of changes to public transit systems. Several local transit accessibility measures exist in the literature, however, it is not clear how these measures relate to public transit usage. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate several transit accessibility measures that are commonly used in the literature by examining their associations with ridership levels at the dissemination area level. The assessed transit accessibility measures ranged from a basic stop count, to gravity-based measures which use distance decay functions from a local household survey, and Walkscore. com's Transit Score. Using several land use and transit service datasets, including data collected from the fare box systems onboard the Saskatoon Transit buses, three types of models were tested. These models include ordinary least square models (OLS), spatial lag models (SLM), and spatial error models (SEM). The results from the models suggest that we can more closely predict actual public transit ridership when including a gravity-based accessibility measure in the model, while controlling for several household socioeconomic factors and built environment characteristics. In all cases, the measure that best fit the variation in ridership was the filtered frequency accessibility measure calculated using a 400 m network buffer and a Butterworth filter with a distance decay bandpass value of 250 m. This study offers transit planners and practitioners a better understanding of the performance of different transit local accessibility measures in relationship to actual transit ridership.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 442
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, PUBLICATION U MINNES
  • [2] The insider: A planners' perspective on accessibility
    Boisjoly, Genevieve
    El-Geneidy, Ahmed M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 64 : 33 - 43
  • [3] Chapman B., 2006, EFFECTS OUT VEHICLE
  • [4] City of Saskatoon a. R.D., 2018, TRANS PLAN
  • [5] Bus Transit Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies: Integrating the Perspectives of Passengers and Transit Agencies in North America
    Diab, Ehab I.
    Badami, Madhav G.
    El-Geneidy, Ahmed M.
    [J]. TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2015, 35 (03) : 292 - 328
  • [6] Accessibility measure of bus transit networks
    Ding, Jishiyu
    Zhang, Yi
    Li, Li
    [J]. IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2018, 12 (07) : 682 - 688
  • [7] Non-stop equity: Assessing daily intersections between transit accessibility and social disparity across the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA)
    El-Geneidy, Ahmed
    Buliung, Ron
    Diab, Ehab
    van Lierop, Dea
    Langlois, Myriam
    Legrain, Alexander
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2016, 43 (03) : 540 - 560
  • [8] Does the edge effect impact on the measure of spatial accessibility to healthcare providers?
    Gao, Fei
    Kihal, Wahida
    Le Meur, Nolwenn
    Souris, Marc
    Deguen, Severine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GEOGRAPHICS, 2017, 16
  • [9] Grise E., 2019, 98 ANN M TRANSP RES
  • [10] GTFS, 2019, SASK TRANS GTFS