The lab management practices of "Research Exemplars" that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators

被引:27
作者
Antes, Alison L. [1 ]
Kuykendall, Ashley [1 ]
DuBois, James M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Gen Med Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT; DECISION-MAKING; MEDIATING ROLE; LEADERSHIP; SCIENTISTS; COGNITION; SCIENCE; ETHICS; ENOUGH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0214595
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Conducting rigorous scientific inquiry within the bounds of research regulation and acceptable practice requires a principal investigator to lead and manage research processes and personnel. This study explores the practices used by investigators nominated as exemplars of research excellence and integrity to produce rigorous, reproducible research and comply with research regulations. Methods Using a qualitative research design, we interviewed 52 principal investigators working in the United States at top research universities and the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program. We solicited nominations of researchers meeting two criteria: (1) they are federally-funded researchers doing high-quality, high-impact research, and (2) have reputations for professionalism and integrity. Each investigator received an initial nomination addressing both criteria and at least one additional endorsement corroborating criteria 2. A panel of researchers and our research team reviewed the nominations to select finalists who were invited to participate. The cohort of "Research Exemplars" includes highly accomplished researchers in diverse scientific disciplines. The semi-structured interview questions asked them to describe the routine practices they employ to foster rigor and regulatory compliance. We used inductive thematic analysis to identify common practices. Results The exemplars identified a core set of 8 practices and provided strategies for employing them. The practices included holding regular team meetings, encouraging shared ownership, providing supervision, ensuring adequate training, fostering positive attitudes about compliance, scrutinizing data and findings, and following standard operating procedures. Above all, the use of these practices aim to create a psychologically safe work environment in which lab members openly collaborate to scrutinize their work and share in accountability for rigorous, compliant research. Conclusions Researchers typically receive limited systematic training in how to lead and manage their research teams. Training and education for principal investigators should include essential leadership and management practices and strategies that support doing high-quality research with integrity.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Allchin D., 1999, Science Education, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1008600230536
  • [2] Normative dissonance in science: Results from a national survey of US scientists
    Anderson, Melissa S.
    Martinson, Brian C.
    De Vries, Raymond
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2007, 2 (04) : 3 - 14
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, BEING SCI GUID RESP
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, CODING MANUAL QUALIT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, PRESIDENT SIGNS OMNI
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2021, Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2013, The CTSA program at NIH: Opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research, DOI [DOI 10.17226/18323, 10.17226/18323]
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2015, Responsible conduct of research
  • [10] Personality and ethical decision-making in research: The role of perceptions of self and others
    Antes, Alison L.
    Brown, Ryan P.
    Murphy, Stephen T.
    Waples, Ethan P.
    Mumford, Michael D.
    Connelly, Shane
    Devenport, Lynn D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2007, 2 (04) : 15 - 34