Effectiveness of the primary therapist model for rheumatoid arthritis rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial

被引:32
作者
Li, LC [1 ]
Davis, AM
Lineker, SC
Coyte, PC
Bombardier, C
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Arthrit Soc, Arthrit Community Res & Evaluat Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Home Care Evaluat & Res Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Mt Sinai Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
来源
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH | 2006年 / 55卷 / 01期
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; rehabilitation; primary therapist model; physical therapy; occupational therapy; randomized controlled trial;
D O I
10.1002/art.21692
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare the primary therapist model (PTM), provided by a single rheumatology-trained primary therapist, with the traditional treatment model (TTM), provided by a physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT) generalist, for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. Eligible patients were adults requiring rehabilitation treatment who had not received PT/OT in the past 2 years. Participants were randomized to the PTM or TTM group. The primary outcome was defined as the proportion of clinical responders who experienced a >= 20% improvement in 2 of the following measures from baseline to 6 months: Health Assessment Questionnaire, pain visual analog scale, and Arthritis Community Research and Evaluation Unit RA Knowledge Questionnaire. Results. Of 144 consenting patients, 33 (10 PTM participants, 23 TTM participants) dropped out without completing any followup assessment, leaving 111 for analysis (63 PTM participants, 48 TTM participants). The majority were women (PTM 87.3%, TTM 79.2%), with a mean age of 54.2 years and 56.8 years for the PTM and TTM groups, respectively. Average disease duration was 10.6 years and 13.2 years for each group, respectively. At 6 months, 44.4% of patients in the PTM group were clinical responders versus 18.8% in the TTM group (chi(2) = 8.09, P = 0.004). Conclusion. Compared with the TTM, the PTM was associated with better outcomes in patients with RA. The results, however, should be interpreted with caution due to the high dropout rate in the TTM group.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 52
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Bell MJ, 1998, J RHEUMATOL, V25, P231
  • [2] Buljina AI, 2001, ARTHRIT RHEUM-ARTHR, V45, P392, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:4<392::AID-ART353>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-2
  • [4] AMERICAN-COLLEGE-OF-RHEUMATOLOGY PRELIMINARY DEFINITION OF IMPROVEMENT IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS
    FELSON, DT
    ANDERSON, JJ
    BOERS, M
    BOMBARDIER, C
    FURST, D
    GOLDSMITH, C
    KATZ, LM
    LIGHTFOOT, R
    PAULUS, H
    STRAND, V
    TUGWELL, P
    WEINBLATT, M
    WILLIAMS, HJ
    WOLFE, F
    KIESZAK, S
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1995, 38 (06): : 727 - 735
  • [5] Feasibility and validity of the RADAI, a self-administered rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index
    Fransen, J
    Langenegger, T
    Michel, BA
    Stucki, G
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2000, 39 (03) : 321 - 327
  • [6] Overview of clinical trials in medical rehabilitation - Impetuses, challenges, and needed future directions
    Fuhrer, MJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2003, 82 (10) : S8 - S15
  • [7] GERBER L, 1987, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V68, P442
  • [8] Adaptation to chronic illness and disability and its relationship to perceptions of independence and dependence
    Gignac, MAM
    Cott, C
    Badley, EM
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2000, 55 (06): : P362 - P372
  • [9] GUILLEMIN F, 1992, J RHEUMATOL, V19, P366
  • [10] GUILLEMIN F, 1994, J RHEUMATOL, V21, P1051