Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: should we use quantitative metrics to better characterize focal lesions originating in the peripheral zone?

被引:17
作者
Pierre, Thibaut [1 ]
Cornud, Francois [1 ,2 ]
Colleter, Loic [3 ]
Beuvon, Frederic [4 ]
Foissac, Frantz [5 ]
Delongchamps, Nicolas B. [6 ]
Legmann, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Cochin, Dept Radiol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] IRM Paris 16, 46 Rue Chardon Lagache, F-75016 Paris, France
[3] Hop St Louis, Dept Radiol, 1 Ave Claude Vellefaux, F-75010 Paris, France
[4] Hop Cochin, Dept Pathol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[5] Hop Tarnier, Dept Biostat, 89 Rue Assas, F-75006 Paris, France
[6] Hop Cochin, Dept Urol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
关键词
Adult; Prostatic neoplasms/diagnostic imaging; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging/methods; Retrospective studies; Sensitivity and specificity; HIGH B-VALUE; DATA SYSTEM; VERSION; COEFFICIENT VALUES; TARGETED BIOPSY; GLEASON SCORE; PI-RADS; T; CANCER; TUMOR;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-017-5107-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To compare inter-reader concordance and accuracy of qualitative diffusion-weighted (DW) PIRADSv2.0 score with those of quantitative DW-MRI for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer. Two radiologists independently assigned a DW-MRI-PIRADS score to 92 PZ-foci, in 74 patients (64.3 +/- 5.6 years old; median PSA level: 8 ng/ml, normal DRE in 70 men). A standardised ADCmean and nine ADC-derived parameters were measured, including ADCratios with the whole-prostate (WP-ADCratio) or the mirror-PZ (mirror-ADCratio) as reference areas. Surgical histology and MRI-TRUS fusion-biopsy were the reference for tumours and benign foci, respectively. Inter-reader agreement was assessed by the Cohen-kappa-coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Univariate-multivariate regressions determined the most predictive factor for cancer. Fifty lesions were malignant. Inter-reader concordance was fair for qualitative assessment, but excellent for quantitative assessment for all quantitative variables. At univariate analysis, ADCmean, WP-ADCratio and WL-ADCmean performed equally, but significantly better than the mirror-ADCratio (p < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, the only independent variable significantly associated with malignancy was the whole-prostate-ADCratio. At a cut-off value of 0.68, sensitivity was 94-90 % and specificity was 60-38 % for readers 1 and 2, respectively. The whole-prostate-ADCratio improved the qualitative inter-reader concordance and characterisation of focal PZ-lesions. aEuro cent Inter-reader concordance of DW PI-RADSv2.0 score for PZ lesions was only fair. aEuro cent Using a standardised ADCmean measurement and derived DW-quantitative parameters, concordance was excellent. aEuro cent The whole-prostate ADCratio performed significantly better than the mirror-ADCratio for cancer detection. aEuro cent At a cut-off of 0.68, sensitivity values of WP-ADCratio were 94-90 %. aEuro cent The whole-prostate ADCratio may circumvent variations of ADC metrics across centres.
引用
收藏
页码:2236 / 2245
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[2]   Ratio of Tumor to Normal Prostate Tissue Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Method for Quantifying DWI of the Prostate [J].
Barrett, Tristan ;
Priest, Andrew N. ;
Lawrence, Edward M. ;
Goldman, Debra A. ;
Warren, Anne Y. ;
Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. ;
Sala, Evis ;
Gallagher, Ferdia A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (06) :W585-W593
[3]   Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for the Detection of Prostate Cancer by the Results of Targeted Biopsy of the Prostate [J].
Baur, Alexander D. J. ;
Maxeiner, Andreas ;
Franiel, Tobias ;
Kilic, Ergin ;
Huppertz, Alexander ;
Schwenke, Carsten ;
Hamm, Bernd ;
Durmus, Tahir .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (06) :411-420
[4]   Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio correlates significantly with prostate cancer gleason score at final pathology [J].
Boesen, Lars ;
Chabanova, Elizaveta ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Balslev, Ingegerd ;
Thomsen, Henrik S. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) :446-453
[5]   How Accurate Is Multiparametric MR Imaging in Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Volume? [J].
Bratan, Flavie ;
Melodelima, Christelle ;
Souchon, Remi ;
Au Hoang Dinh ;
Mege-Lechevallier, Florence ;
Crouzet, Sebastien ;
Colombel, Marc ;
Gelet, Albert ;
Rouviere, Olivier .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (01) :144-154
[6]   Tumor Target Volume for Focal Therapy of Prostate Cancerd-Does Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Allow for a Reliable Estimation? [J].
Cornud, F. ;
Khoury, Gaby ;
Bouazza, Naim ;
Beuvon, Frederic ;
Peyromaure, Michael ;
Flam, Thierry ;
Zerbib, Marc ;
Legmann, Paul ;
Delongchamps, Nicolas B. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (05) :1272-1279
[7]   Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value and Ratio as Noninvasive Potential Biomarkers to Predict Prostate Cancer Grading: Comparison With Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimen [J].
De Cobelli, Francesco ;
Ravelli, Silvia ;
Esposito, Antonio ;
Giganti, Francesco ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Del Maschio, Alessandro .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (03) :550-557
[8]   Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Targeted Biopsies-Should Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Guided Biopsies Alone be a Standard of Care? [J].
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry ;
Lefevre, Arnaud ;
Bouazza, Naim ;
Beuvon, Frederic ;
Legman, Paul ;
Cornud, Francois .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04) :1198-1204
[9]   Prostate MRI: Evaluating Tumor Volume and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as Surrogate Biomarkers for Predicting Tumor Gleason Score [J].
Donati, Olivio F. ;
Afaq, Asim ;
Vargas, Hebert Alberto ;
Mazaheri, Yousef ;
Zheng, Junting ;
Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Akin, Oguz .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (14) :3705-3711
[10]   An Update of the Gleason Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) :433-440