共 34 条
Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: should we use quantitative metrics to better characterize focal lesions originating in the peripheral zone?
被引:17
作者:
Pierre, Thibaut
[1
]
Cornud, Francois
[1
,2
]
Colleter, Loic
[3
]
Beuvon, Frederic
[4
]
Foissac, Frantz
[5
]
Delongchamps, Nicolas B.
[6
]
Legmann, Paul
[1
]
机构:
[1] Hop Cochin, Dept Radiol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] IRM Paris 16, 46 Rue Chardon Lagache, F-75016 Paris, France
[3] Hop St Louis, Dept Radiol, 1 Ave Claude Vellefaux, F-75010 Paris, France
[4] Hop Cochin, Dept Pathol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[5] Hop Tarnier, Dept Biostat, 89 Rue Assas, F-75006 Paris, France
[6] Hop Cochin, Dept Urol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
关键词:
Adult;
Prostatic neoplasms/diagnostic imaging;
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging/methods;
Retrospective studies;
Sensitivity and specificity;
HIGH B-VALUE;
DATA SYSTEM;
VERSION;
COEFFICIENT VALUES;
TARGETED BIOPSY;
GLEASON SCORE;
PI-RADS;
T;
CANCER;
TUMOR;
D O I:
10.1007/s00330-017-5107-2
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
To compare inter-reader concordance and accuracy of qualitative diffusion-weighted (DW) PIRADSv2.0 score with those of quantitative DW-MRI for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer. Two radiologists independently assigned a DW-MRI-PIRADS score to 92 PZ-foci, in 74 patients (64.3 +/- 5.6 years old; median PSA level: 8 ng/ml, normal DRE in 70 men). A standardised ADCmean and nine ADC-derived parameters were measured, including ADCratios with the whole-prostate (WP-ADCratio) or the mirror-PZ (mirror-ADCratio) as reference areas. Surgical histology and MRI-TRUS fusion-biopsy were the reference for tumours and benign foci, respectively. Inter-reader agreement was assessed by the Cohen-kappa-coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Univariate-multivariate regressions determined the most predictive factor for cancer. Fifty lesions were malignant. Inter-reader concordance was fair for qualitative assessment, but excellent for quantitative assessment for all quantitative variables. At univariate analysis, ADCmean, WP-ADCratio and WL-ADCmean performed equally, but significantly better than the mirror-ADCratio (p < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, the only independent variable significantly associated with malignancy was the whole-prostate-ADCratio. At a cut-off value of 0.68, sensitivity was 94-90 % and specificity was 60-38 % for readers 1 and 2, respectively. The whole-prostate-ADCratio improved the qualitative inter-reader concordance and characterisation of focal PZ-lesions. aEuro cent Inter-reader concordance of DW PI-RADSv2.0 score for PZ lesions was only fair. aEuro cent Using a standardised ADCmean measurement and derived DW-quantitative parameters, concordance was excellent. aEuro cent The whole-prostate ADCratio performed significantly better than the mirror-ADCratio for cancer detection. aEuro cent At a cut-off of 0.68, sensitivity values of WP-ADCratio were 94-90 %. aEuro cent The whole-prostate ADCratio may circumvent variations of ADC metrics across centres.
引用
收藏
页码:2236 / 2245
页数:10
相关论文