Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction Ratings; Multiple Group Invariance Analysis Across Scales with Different Response Format

被引:7
作者
Mazaheri, Mehrdad [1 ]
Theuns, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sistan & Baluchestan, Dept Psychol, Zahedan, Iran
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Structural equation modeling; Satisfaction; Dissatisfaction; Multiple group invariance analysis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-008-9278-8
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The current study evaluates three hypothesized models on subjective well-being, comprising life domain ratings (LDR), overall satisfaction with life (OSWL), and overall dissatisfaction with life (ODWL), using structural equation modeling (SEM). A sample of 1,310 volunteering students, randomly assigned to six conditions, rated their overall life (dis)satisfaction and their (dis)satisfaction with six different life domains. Each condition used one of six response formats, differing in (1) orientation (horizontal vs. vertical), and (2) anchoring (0 to 10, -5 to +5, and Not numbered). The results of a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) support a six-factor model of LDR based on satisfaction or dissatisfaction items. However, our findings indicate that the kind of response format used to obtain satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings can affect the factor loadings. Our results indicate that the proposed models of OSWL, and ODWL fit the data well, and are able to predict OSWL and ODWL, respectively. Moreover, among six life domains, which figure as the latent variables in our models, psychological well-being was found to be the strongest predictor of both OSWL and ODWL.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 221
页数:19
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 48 ANN C AM ASS PUBL
  • [2] BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • [3] Bernheim J., 2006, J HAPPINESS STUD, V7, P227, DOI [10.1007/s10902-005-4755-0, DOI 10.1007/S10902-005-4755-0]
  • [4] Bernheim J., 1984, J PSYCHOSOC ONCOL, V1, P25, DOI DOI 10.1300/J077V01N04_
  • [5] QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT - A COMPARISON OF 4 QUESTIONNAIRES - FOR MEASURING IMPROVEMENTS AFTER TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT
    BORSTLAP, M
    ZANT, JL
    VANSOESBERGEN, RM
    VANDERKORST, JKL
    [J]. CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 1995, 14 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [6] Health status versus utilities of patients with end-stage liver disease
    Bryce, CL
    Angus, DC
    Switala, JA
    Roberts, MS
    Tsevat, J
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (04) : 773 - 782
  • [7] Byrne B.M., 2001, Multivariate applications book series.Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications
  • [8] Byrne B.M., 1998, Multivariate applications book series. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications
  • [9] ON THE TRAIL OF THE GOLD STANDARD FOR SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING
    CUMMINS, RA
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1995, 35 (02) : 179 - 200
  • [10] Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life?
    de Boer, AGEM
    van Lanschot, JJB
    Stalmeier, PFM
    van Sandick, JW
    Hulscher, JBF
    de Haes, JCJM
    Sprangers, MAG
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (02) : 311 - 320