Fully Automated Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion via a Probabilistic Registration Metric

被引:10
|
作者
Sparks, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Bloch, B. Nicolas [3 ]
Feleppa, Ernest [4 ]
Barratt, Dean [5 ]
Madabhushi, Anant [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Boston Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Lizzi Ctr Biomed Engn, Riverside Res, New York, NY 10001 USA
[5] UCL, Ctr Med Image Comp, London, England
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING | 2013年 / 8671卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MRI/TRUS DATA FUSION; GUIDED BIOPSY; CANCER-DETECTION; IMAGES; MRI; SEGMENTATION; INHOMOGENEITY; BRACHYTHERAPY; SPECTROSCOPY; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1117/12.2007610
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In this work, we present a novel, automated, registration method to fuse magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images of the prostate. Our methodology consists of: (1) delineating the prostate on MRI, (2) building a probabilistic model of prostate location on TRUS, and (3) aligning the MRI prostate segmentation to the TRUS probabilistic model. TRUS-guided needle biopsy is the current gold standard for prostate cancer (CaP) diagnosis. Up to 40% of CaP lesions appear isoechoic on TRUS, hence TRUS-guided biopsy cannot reliably target CaP lesions and is associated with a high false negative rate. MRI is better able to distinguish CaP from benign prostatic tissue, but requires special equipment and training. MRI-TRUS fusion, whereby MRI is acquired pre-operatively and aligned to TRUS during the biopsy procedure, allows for information from both modalities to be used to help guide the biopsy. The use of MRI and TRUS in combination to guide biopsy at least doubles the yield of positive biopsies. Previous work on MRI-TRUS fusion has involved aligning manually determined fiducials or prostate surfaces to achieve image registration. The accuracy of these methods is dependent on the reader's ability to determine fiducials or prostate surfaces with minimal error, which is a difficult and time-consuming task. Our novel, fully automated MRI-TRUS fusion method represents a significant advance over the current state-of-the-art because it does not require manual intervention after TRUS acquisition. All necessary preprocessing steps (i.e. delineation of the prostate on MRI) can be performed offline prior to the biopsy procedure. We evaluated our method on seven patient studies, with B-mode TRUS and a 1.5 T surface coil MRI. Our method has a root mean square error (RMSE) for expertly selected fiducials (consisting of the urethra, calcifications, and the centroids of CaP nodules) of 3.39 +/- 0.85 mm.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsies increase the rate of cancer detection in populations with a low incidence of prostate cancer
    Kaushal, Rohit
    Das, Chandan J.
    Singh, Prabhjot
    Dogra, Prem Nath
    Kumar, Rajeev
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2019, 60 (03) : 156 - 161
  • [42] Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Hirahara, Naoki
    Fujihara, Atsuko
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Iwata, Tsuyoshi
    Kamoi, Kazumi
    Okihara, Koji
    Ito, Hirotoshi
    Nishimura, Tsunehiko
    Miki, Tsuneharu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (10) : 890 - 893
  • [43] Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study
    Pham, Trang H. N.
    Schulze-Hagen, Maximilian F.
    Rahnama'i, Mohammad S.
    CANCER REPORTS, 2024, 7 (02)
  • [44] Deep learning facilitates fully automated brain image registration of optoacoustic tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Hu, Yexing
    Lafci, Berkan
    Luzgin, Artur
    Wang, Hao
    Klohs, Jan
    Dean-Ben, Xose Luis
    Ni, Ruiqing
    Razansky, Daniel
    Ren, Wuwei
    BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2022, 13 (09) : 4817 - 4833
  • [45] Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer
    Fischerova, D.
    Cibula, D.
    Stenhova, H.
    Vondrichova, H.
    Calda, P.
    Zikan, M.
    Freitag, P.
    Slama, J.
    Dundr, P.
    Belacek, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 (04) : 766 - 772
  • [46] AUTOMATED REGISTRATION OF FREEHAND B-MODE ULTRASOUND AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE CAROTID ARTERIES BASED ON GEOMETRIC FEATURES
    Carvalho, Diego D. B.
    Lorza, Andres Mauricio Arias
    Niessen, Wiro J.
    De Bruijne, Marleen
    Klein, Stefan
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 43 (01) : 273 - 285
  • [47] Magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound prostate image segmentation based on improved level set for robotic prostate biopsy navigation
    Wang, Weirong
    Pan, Bo
    Yan, Jiawen
    Fu, Yili
    Liu, Yanjie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [48] The Impact of Prostate Volume on Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Transrectal Ultrasound in Biopsy-naive Men
    Ye, Jianjun
    Zhang, Chichen
    Zheng, Lei
    Wang, Qihao
    Wu, Qiyou
    Tu, Xiang
    Bao, Yige
    Wei, Qiang
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 64 : 1 - 8
  • [49] The Learning Curve for Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy
    Kasabwala, Khushabu
    Patel, Neal
    Cricco-Lizza, Eliza
    Shimpi, Adrian A.
    Weng, Stanley
    Buchmann, Rose M.
    Motanagh, Samaneh
    Wu, Yiyuan
    Banerjee, Samprit
    Khani, Francesca
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Robinson, Brian D.
    Hu, Jim C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (02): : 135 - 140
  • [50] Histology results of systematic prostate biopsies by in-bore magnetic resonance imaging vs. transrectal ultrasound
    Lazarovich, Alon
    Raviv, Gil
    Laitman, Yael
    Portnoy, Orith
    Raz, Orit
    Dotan, Zohar A.
    Ramon, Jacob
    Rosenzweig, Barak
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (05): : E244 - E247