Fully Automated Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion via a Probabilistic Registration Metric

被引:10
|
作者
Sparks, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Bloch, B. Nicolas [3 ]
Feleppa, Ernest [4 ]
Barratt, Dean [5 ]
Madabhushi, Anant [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Boston Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Lizzi Ctr Biomed Engn, Riverside Res, New York, NY 10001 USA
[5] UCL, Ctr Med Image Comp, London, England
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MRI/TRUS DATA FUSION; GUIDED BIOPSY; CANCER-DETECTION; IMAGES; MRI; SEGMENTATION; INHOMOGENEITY; BRACHYTHERAPY; SPECTROSCOPY; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1117/12.2007610
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In this work, we present a novel, automated, registration method to fuse magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images of the prostate. Our methodology consists of: (1) delineating the prostate on MRI, (2) building a probabilistic model of prostate location on TRUS, and (3) aligning the MRI prostate segmentation to the TRUS probabilistic model. TRUS-guided needle biopsy is the current gold standard for prostate cancer (CaP) diagnosis. Up to 40% of CaP lesions appear isoechoic on TRUS, hence TRUS-guided biopsy cannot reliably target CaP lesions and is associated with a high false negative rate. MRI is better able to distinguish CaP from benign prostatic tissue, but requires special equipment and training. MRI-TRUS fusion, whereby MRI is acquired pre-operatively and aligned to TRUS during the biopsy procedure, allows for information from both modalities to be used to help guide the biopsy. The use of MRI and TRUS in combination to guide biopsy at least doubles the yield of positive biopsies. Previous work on MRI-TRUS fusion has involved aligning manually determined fiducials or prostate surfaces to achieve image registration. The accuracy of these methods is dependent on the reader's ability to determine fiducials or prostate surfaces with minimal error, which is a difficult and time-consuming task. Our novel, fully automated MRI-TRUS fusion method represents a significant advance over the current state-of-the-art because it does not require manual intervention after TRUS acquisition. All necessary preprocessing steps (i.e. delineation of the prostate on MRI) can be performed offline prior to the biopsy procedure. We evaluated our method on seven patient studies, with B-mode TRUS and a 1.5 T surface coil MRI. Our method has a root mean square error (RMSE) for expertly selected fiducials (consisting of the urethra, calcifications, and the centroids of CaP nodules) of 3.39 +/- 0.85 mm.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Ready for "Prime Time"?
    Loeb, Stacy
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) : 20 - 21
  • [32] COMPARISON OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE STAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    CHADWICK, DJ
    COBBY, M
    GODDARD, P
    GINGELL, JC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 67 (06): : 616 - 621
  • [33] LOCALIZED STAGING OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA - COMPARISON OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    DRAGO, JR
    BADALAMENT, RA
    NESBITT, JA
    GERANIOTIS, E
    HORCHAK, A
    UROLOGY, 1990, 35 (06) : 511 - 512
  • [34] BALLOON DILATION OF THE PROSTATE - CORRELATION WITH MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND FINDINGS
    RENFER, L
    THOMPSON, IM
    DESMOND, PM
    ZEIDMAN, EJ
    MUELLER, EJ
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1995, 9 (03) : 283 - 286
  • [35] COMPARISON OF ELASTIC AND RIGID REGISTRATION DURDING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING/ULTRASOUND FUSION-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Hale, Graham R.
    Czarniecki, Marcin
    Cheng, Alexis
    Bloom, Jonathan B.
    Seifabadi, Reza
    Gold, Samuel A.
    Rayn, Kareem N.
    Sabarwal, Vik
    Grave, Gustavo Pena-La
    Valera, Vladimir
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Brad
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E338 - E339
  • [36] Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsies improve rates of prostate cancer diagnosis: a direct comparison of fusion and standard transrectal ultrasound biopsies in the same population
    Day, E.
    Rewhorn, M. J.
    Gurun, M.
    Meddings, R.
    McLaughlin, G.
    Chanock, D.
    Clark, R.
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 63 (01) : 49 - 49
  • [37] Editorial Comment: Environmental Impact of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Thiel, Cassandra L.
    Gordon, Ilyssa
    Nolte, Adam C.
    Perecman, Aaron
    Loeb, Stacy
    Overcash, Michael
    Sherman, Jodi
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2023, 49 (03): : 383 - 385
  • [38] PROPENSITY SCORE ANALYSIS OF PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOME AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY VERSUS UNTARGETED EXTENDED TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Arora, Hans
    Elshafei, Ahmed
    Nyame, Yaw
    Sun, Daniel
    Liang, Helen
    Yerram, Nitin
    Greene, Daniel
    Grimberg, Dominic
    Gupta, Karishma
    Agrawal, Shree
    Isharwal, Sudhir
    Babbar, Paurush
    Sun, Andrew
    Fareed, Khaled
    Gong, Michael
    Berglund, Ryan
    Klein, Eric
    Stephenson, Andrew
    Purysko, Andrei
    Jones, J. Stephen
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E488 - E489
  • [39] Accuracy of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion for Detection of Prostate Cancer During Brachytherapy
    Bubley, Glenn J.
    Bloch, B. N.
    Vazquez, Cesar
    Genega, Elizabeth
    Holupka, Ed
    Rofsky, Neil
    Kaplan, Irving
    UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (06) : 1284 - 1289
  • [40] The Role of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men With Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Bryk, Darren J.
    Llukani, Elton
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Huang, William C.
    Lepor, Herbert
    UROLOGY, 2017, 102 : 178 - 182