Quantitative Sensory Testing in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

被引:124
|
作者
Uddin, Zakir [1 ,2 ]
MacDermid, Joy C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Sharjah, Dept Physiotherapy, Coll Hlth Sci, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[3] St Josephs Hlth Ctr, Clin Res Lab, Hand & Upper Limb Ctr, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Hyperesthesia; Hypoesthesia; Chronic Pain; Maladaptive Pain; Sensory Measurement; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; PRESSURE PAIN; THRESHOLD; RELIABILITY; PERCEPTION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; DIAGNOSIS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1093/pm/pnv105
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. In recent years, several published articles have demonstrated that quantitative sensory testing (QST) is useful in the analysis of musculoskeletal pain disorders. Based on the evidence from these studies, it is assumed that QST might be a useful tool in the analysis of the pathogenesis, classification, differential diagnosis, and prognosis of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Objectives. The objective of this paper is to discuss measurement properties of QST and potentials research and clinical applications in musculoskeletal pain. Methods. This is a review of the current knowledge base on QST as it relates to musculoskeletal pain disorders. We based our summary on articles retrieved from Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to present) including EMBASE, AMED, and PsycINFO databases to search for all published literature focused on QST and musculoskeletal pain. Results. QST has been shown to be related to neural sensitivity in musculoskeletal pain. QST measurement properties have been evaluated for multiple sensory evaluation modalities and protocols with no clear superior instrument or test protocol. The research evidence is incomplete, but suggests potential clinical benefits for predicting outcomes and subtyping pain. Threshold detection testing is commonly used to quantify sensory loss or gain, in current practice and has shown moderate reliability. Intensity/magnitude rating can be assessed on a wide range of rating scales and may be more useful for pain rating in a clinical context. Threshold detection-based testing and intensity/magnitude rating-based testing can be combined to determine pain threshold in clinical evaluation. Conclusions. Musculoskeletal pain management may benefit from treatment algorithms that consider mechanism, pain quality, or neurophysiological correlates. Non-invasive QST may be helpful to find sensory array of altered nociceptive process. Due to the diverse etiopathogenetic basis of musculoskeletal pain disorders, a broad range of reliable and valid QST tests may be needed to analyze the various disease entities.
引用
收藏
页码:1694 / 1703
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of somatosensory profiles by quantitative sensory testing in children and adolescents with and without cerebral palsy and chronic pain
    Jorgensen, Johanne Villars
    Werner, Mads Utke
    Michelsen, Josephine Sandahl
    Tierp-Wong, Christian Nai En
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2024, 51 : 32 - 40
  • [22] Measurement Error of a Simplified Protocol for Quantitative Sensory Tests in Chronic Pain Patients
    Mueller, Monika
    Manresa, Jose Alberto Biurrun
    Limacher, Andreas
    Streitberger, Konrad
    Juni, Peter
    Andersen, Ole Koeseler
    Curatolo, Michele
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2017, 42 (05) : 660 - 668
  • [23] Quantitative sensory testing for pain: What exactly are we measuring?
    Owens, Michael A.
    Thomas, Pavithra A.
    Crowe, Corina
    Goodin, Burel R.
    Overstreet, Demario S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 62
  • [24] Neuropathic Pain: Is Quantitative Sensory Testing Helpful?
    Elena K. Krumova
    Christian Geber
    Andrea Westermann
    Christoph Maier
    Current Diabetes Reports, 2012, 12 : 393 - 402
  • [25] Increased Pain Sensitivity in Chronic Pain Subjects on Opioid Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Quantitative Sensory Testing
    Zhang, Yi
    Ahmed, Shihab
    Trang Vo
    St Hilaire, Kristin
    Houghton, Mary
    Cohen, Abigail S.
    Mao, Jianren
    Chen, Lucy
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (05) : 911 - 922
  • [26] Neuropathic Pain: Is Quantitative Sensory Testing Helpful?
    Krumova, Elena K.
    Geber, Christian
    Westermann, Andrea
    Maier, Christoph
    CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS, 2012, 12 (04) : 393 - 402
  • [27] A population-based study of quantitative sensory testing in adolescents with and without chronic pain
    Tham, See Wan
    Palermo, Tonya M.
    Holley, Amy Lewandowski
    Zhou, Chuan
    Stubhaug, Audun
    Furberg, Anne-Sofie
    Nielsen, Christopher Sivert
    PAIN, 2016, 157 (12) : 2807 - 2815
  • [28] Rationale for and Development of the Pancreatic Quantitative Sensory Testing Consortium to Study Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis
    Phillips, Anna Evans
    Faghih, Mahya
    Singh, Vikesh K.
    Olesen, Soren Schou
    Kuhlmann, Louise
    Novovic, Srdan
    Bick, Benjamin
    Hart, Philip A.
    Ramsey, Mitchell L.
    Talukdar, Rupjyoti
    Garg, Pramod K.
    Yadav, Dhiraj
    Drewes, Asbjorn Mohr
    PANCREAS, 2021, 50 (09) : 1298 - 1304
  • [29] Test-retest reliability of a simple bedside-quantitative sensory testing battery for chronic neuropathic pain
    Sachau, Juliane
    Appel, Christina
    Reimer, Maren
    Sendel, Manon
    Vollert, Jan
    Huellemann, Philipp
    Baron, Ralf
    PAIN REPORTS, 2023, 8 (01) : E1049
  • [30] Replicate effects and test-retest reliability of quantitative sensory threshold testing in dogs with and without chronic pain
    Knazovicky, David
    Helgeson, Erika S.
    Case, Beth
    Thomson, Andrea
    Gruen, Margaret E.
    Maixner, William
    Lascelles, B. Duncan X.
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 44 (03) : 615 - 624