Measuring the quality of dying and death in advanced cancer: Item characteristics and factor structure of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire

被引:9
|
作者
Mah, Kenneth [1 ]
Hales, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Weerakkody, Isuri [1 ]
Liu, Lucy [1 ]
Fernandes, Samantha [1 ]
Rydall, Anne [1 ]
Vehling, Sigrun [3 ,4 ]
Zimmermann, Camilla [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Rodin, Gary [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Support Care, LuCliff Pl,Rm 2303-10,700 Bay St, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z6, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Med Psychol, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Palliat Care Unit, Dept Oncol Hematol & Bone Marrow Transplantat, Sect Pneumol, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Princess Margaret Canc Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Global Inst Psychosocial Palliat & End Life Caare, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Quality of dying and death; advanced cancer; palliative care; end-of-life care; factor analysis; questionnaires; OF-LIFE CARE; PALLIATIVE CARE; SPIRITUAL SUPPORT; FAMILY-MEMBERS; END; ASSOCIATIONS; VALIDATION; PRIORITIES; DISTRESS; VERSION;
D O I
10.1177/0269216318819607
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Ensuring a good death in individuals with advanced disease is a fundamental goal of palliative care. However, the lack of a validated patient-centered measure of quality of dying and death in advanced cancer has limited quality assessments of palliative-care interventions and outcomes. Aim: To examine item characteristics and the factor structure of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire in advanced cancer. Design: Cross-sectional study with pooled samples. Setting/participants: Caregivers of deceased advanced-cancer patients (N = 602; mean ages = 56.39-62.23 years), pooled from three studies involving urban hospitals, a hospice, and a community care access center in Ontario, Canada, completed the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire 8-10 months after patient death. Results: Psychosocial and practical item ratings demonstrated negative skewness, suggesting positive perceptions; ratings of symptoms and function were poorer. Of four models evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses, a 20-item, four-factor model, derived through exploratory factor analysis and comprising Symptoms and Functioning, Preparation for Death, Spiritual Activities, and Acceptance of Dying, demonstrated good fit and internally consistent factors (Cronbach's alpha = 0.70-0.83). Multiple regression analyses indicated that quality of dying was most strongly associated with Symptoms and Functioning and that quality of death was most strongly associated with Preparation for Death (p < 0.001). Conclusion: A new four-factor model best characterized quality of dying and death in advanced cancer as measured by the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire. Future research should examine the value of adding a connectedness factor and evaluate the sensitivity of the scale to detect intervention effects across factors.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 380
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring the quality of dying and death: methodological considerations and recent findings
    Engelberg, Ruth A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 12 (05) : 381 - 387
  • [22] The Quality of Dying and Death in a Residential Hospice
    Weerakkody, Isuri
    Hales, Sarah
    Fernandes, Samantha
    Emmerson, Debbie
    O'Neill, William
    Zimmermann, Camilla
    Rodin, Gary
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 56 (04) : 567 - 574
  • [23] Tools Measuring Quality of Death, Dying, and Care, Completed after Death: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties
    Kupeli, Nuriye
    Candy, Bridget
    Tamura-Rose, Gabrielle
    Schofield, Guy
    Webber, Natalie
    Hicks, Stephanie E.
    Floyd, Theodore
    Vivat, Bella
    Sampson, Elizabeth L.
    Stone, Patrick
    Aspden, Trefor
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (02): : 183 - 197
  • [24] Quality of dying and death in intensive care units: family satisfaction
    Wen, Fur-Hsing
    Chiang, Ming Chu
    Huang, Chung-Chi
    Hu, Tsung-Hui
    Chou, Wen-Chi
    Chuang, Li-Pang
    Tang, Siew Tzuh
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 13 (E3) : e1217 - e1227
  • [25] Assessing the Quality of Death and Dying in an Integrated Health Care System in Rural Pennsylvania
    Darer, Jonathan D.
    Clarke, Deserae N.
    Sees, Amanda C.
    Berger, Andrea L.
    Kirchner, H. Lester
    Stametz, Rebecca A.
    Davis, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2015, 50 (03) : 343 - +
  • [26] Cross Country Comparison of Expert Assessments of the Quality of Death and Dying 2021
    Finkelstein, Eric A.
    Bhadelia, Afsan
    Goh, Cynthia
    Baid, Drishti
    Singh, Ratna
    Bhatnagar, Sushma
    Connor, Stephen R.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63 (04) : E419 - E429
  • [27] The quality of supportive care among inpatients dying with advanced cancer
    Walling, Anne M.
    Asch, Steven M.
    Lorenz, Karl A.
    Malin, Jennifer
    Roth, Carol P.
    Barry, Tod
    Wenger, Neil S.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (09) : 2189 - 2194
  • [28] A systematic review of instruments measuring the quality of dying and death in Asian countries
    Shuo Xu
    Yue Fang
    Hanzhang Chen
    Kang Sun
    Chen Zhang
    Yang Liu
    Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 1831 - 1842
  • [29] Intensive care unit interventions to improve quality of dying and death: scoping review
    Naya, Kazuaki
    Sakuramoto, Hideaki
    Aikawa, Gen
    Ouchi, Akira
    Oyama, Yusuke
    Tanaka, Yuta
    Kaneko, Kentaro
    Fukushima, Ayako
    Ota, Yuma
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024,
  • [30] The Quality of Dying and Death Is It Ready for Use as an Outcome Measure?
    Curtis, J. Randall
    Downey, Lois
    Engelberg, Ruth A.
    CHEST, 2013, 143 (02) : 289 - 291