Measuring the quality of dying and death in advanced cancer: Item characteristics and factor structure of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire

被引:9
|
作者
Mah, Kenneth [1 ]
Hales, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Weerakkody, Isuri [1 ]
Liu, Lucy [1 ]
Fernandes, Samantha [1 ]
Rydall, Anne [1 ]
Vehling, Sigrun [3 ,4 ]
Zimmermann, Camilla [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Rodin, Gary [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Support Care, LuCliff Pl,Rm 2303-10,700 Bay St, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z6, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Med Psychol, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Palliat Care Unit, Dept Oncol Hematol & Bone Marrow Transplantat, Sect Pneumol, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Princess Margaret Canc Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Global Inst Psychosocial Palliat & End Life Caare, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Quality of dying and death; advanced cancer; palliative care; end-of-life care; factor analysis; questionnaires; OF-LIFE CARE; PALLIATIVE CARE; SPIRITUAL SUPPORT; FAMILY-MEMBERS; END; ASSOCIATIONS; VALIDATION; PRIORITIES; DISTRESS; VERSION;
D O I
10.1177/0269216318819607
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Ensuring a good death in individuals with advanced disease is a fundamental goal of palliative care. However, the lack of a validated patient-centered measure of quality of dying and death in advanced cancer has limited quality assessments of palliative-care interventions and outcomes. Aim: To examine item characteristics and the factor structure of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire in advanced cancer. Design: Cross-sectional study with pooled samples. Setting/participants: Caregivers of deceased advanced-cancer patients (N = 602; mean ages = 56.39-62.23 years), pooled from three studies involving urban hospitals, a hospice, and a community care access center in Ontario, Canada, completed the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire 8-10 months after patient death. Results: Psychosocial and practical item ratings demonstrated negative skewness, suggesting positive perceptions; ratings of symptoms and function were poorer. Of four models evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses, a 20-item, four-factor model, derived through exploratory factor analysis and comprising Symptoms and Functioning, Preparation for Death, Spiritual Activities, and Acceptance of Dying, demonstrated good fit and internally consistent factors (Cronbach's alpha = 0.70-0.83). Multiple regression analyses indicated that quality of dying was most strongly associated with Symptoms and Functioning and that quality of death was most strongly associated with Preparation for Death (p < 0.001). Conclusion: A new four-factor model best characterized quality of dying and death in advanced cancer as measured by the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire. Future research should examine the value of adding a connectedness factor and evaluate the sensitivity of the scale to detect intervention effects across factors.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 380
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of instruments measuring the quality of dying and death in Asian countries
    Xu, Shuo
    Fang, Yue
    Chen, Hanzhang
    Sun, Kang
    Zhang, Chen
    Liu, Yang
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (07) : 1831 - 1842
  • [2] Evaluation of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire in Kenya
    Mah, Kenneth
    Powell, Richard A.
    Malfitano, Carmine
    Gikaara, Nancy
    Chalklin, Lesley
    Hales, Sarah
    Rydall, Anne
    Zimmermann, Camilla
    Mwangi-Powell, Faith N.
    Rodin, Gary
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 : 1 - 16
  • [3] The quality of death and dying of patients with advanced cancer in hospice care in Uganda and Kenya
    Goombs, Mary
    Mah, Kenneth
    Namisango, Eve
    Luyirika, Emmanuel
    Mwangi-Powell, Faith
    Gikaara, Nancy
    Chalklin, Lesley
    Rydall, Anne
    Zimmermann, Camilla
    Hales, Sarah
    Wolofsky, Kayla
    Tilly, Alyssa
    Powell, Richard A.
    Rodin, Gary
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2023,
  • [4] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire for the Spanish population
    Gutierrez Sanchez, Daniel
    Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2018, 33 : 8 - 13
  • [5] The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): Empirical Domains and Theoretical Perspectives
    Downey, Lois
    Curtis, J. Randall
    Lafferty, William E.
    Herting, Jerald R.
    Engelberg, Ruth A.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 39 (01) : 9 - 22
  • [6] Understanding Bereaved Caregiver Evaluations of the Quality of Dying and Death: An Application of Cognitive Interviewing Methodology to the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire
    Hales, Sarah
    Gagliese, Lucia
    Nissim, Rinat
    Zimmermann, Camilla
    Rodin, Gary
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2012, 43 (02) : 195 - 204
  • [7] The Quality of Dying and Death in Cancer and Its Relationship to Palliative Care and Place of Death
    Hales, Sarah
    Chiu, Aubrey
    Husain, Amna
    Braun, Michal
    Rydall, Anne
    Gagliese, Lucia
    Zimmermann, Camilla
    Rodin, Gary
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 48 (05) : 839 - 851
  • [8] Quality of dying and death with cancer in Israel
    Braun, Michal
    Hasson-Ohayon, Ilanit
    Hales, Sarah
    Zimmermann, Camilla
    Rydall, Anne
    Peretz, Tamar
    Rodin, Gary
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (07) : 1973 - 1980
  • [9] Validation of the German Version of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire for Health Professionals
    Heckel, Maria
    Bussmann, Sonja
    Stiel, Stephanie
    Ostgathe, Christoph
    Weber, Martin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 33 (08): : 760 - 769
  • [10] Place of Death and the Differences in Patient Quality of Death and Dying and Caregiver Burden
    Kinoshita, Hiroya
    Maeda, Isseki
    Morita, Tatsuya
    Miyashita, Mitsunori
    Yamagishi, Akemi
    Shirahige, Yutaka
    Takebayashi, Toru
    Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
    Igarashi, Ayumi
    Eguchi, Kenji
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (04) : 357 - U105