A comparison of ground-based LiDAR and met mast wind measurements for wind resource assessment over various terrain conditions

被引:40
作者
Kim, Daeyoung [1 ]
Kim, Taewan [2 ]
Oh, Gwanjun [3 ]
Huh, Jongchul [4 ]
Ko, Kyungnam [5 ]
机构
[1] Korea Meteorol Adm, Natl Inst Meteorol Res, Appl Meteorol Res Div, Jeju, South Korea
[2] Korea Southern Power Cp Ltd, Namjeju Thermo Power Plant Wind Farm Management T, Busan, South Korea
[3] DoArm Engn Co Ltd, 86-9 Cheomdanro 8 Gil, Jeju, South Korea
[4] Jeju Natl Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 102 Jejudaehakro, Jeju, South Korea
[5] Jeju Natl Univ, Grad Sch, Fac Wind Energy Engn, 102 Jejudaehakro, Jeju, South Korea
关键词
Wind data; LiDAR; Ruggedness Index (RIX); Complex terrain; CFD; ENERGY APPLICATIONS; COMPLEX TERRAIN; ANEMOMETRY; BEHAVIOR; ERROR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2016.09.011
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In order to assess reliability of measurements from LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), a measurement campaign was led using ground-based LiDAR of WINDCUBE V2 and meteorological masts at three measurement sites: Sumang, Gangjeong, and Susan, on Jeju Island, Korea. Each site had a different topographical complexity, which was evaluated by using a Ruggedness Index (RIX). Wind data was collected for 11-14 days from four heights on each site's met mast. Data filtering was done to ensure data comparability between LiDAR and wind sensors. Analyses of LiDAR error, standard deviation, turbulence intensity and LiDAR error rate were conducted on data coming from each site. Also, the CFD analysis was performed at Sumang with the highest RIX. As a result, the concurrent wind measurement slopes were all close to one based on linear regression analysis. The coefficient of determination was almost all more than 0.9 for all heights at each site. LiDAR error rates for the measurement sites ranged approximately between 2% and 6%. The result of the CFD analysis showed that the depression was formed between two parasitic cones, between which the measurement point of Sumang was located, which led to greater positive LiDAR error.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 121
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Computational modelling for wind energy assessment
    Ayotte, Keith W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (10-11) : 1571 - 1590
  • [2] 3D Volumetric Analysis of Wind Turbine Wake Properties in the Atmosphere Using High-Resolution Doppler Lidar
    Banta, Robert M.
    Pichugina, Yelena L.
    Brewer, W. Alan
    Lundquist, Julie K.
    Kelley, Neil D.
    Sandberg, Scott P.
    Alvarez, Raul J., II
    Hardesty, R. Michael
    Weickmann, Ann M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 32 (05) : 904 - 914
  • [3] Underestimation of Monostatic Sodar Measurements in Complex Terrain
    Behrens, Paul
    O'Sullivan, J.
    Archer, R.
    Bradley, S.
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2012, 143 (01) : 97 - 106
  • [4] Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain
    Bingoel, Ferhat
    Mann, Jakob
    Foussekis, Dimitri
    [J]. METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2009, 18 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [5] Bowen A.J., 2004, RISOR995EN RISONATIO
  • [6] Remote sensing winds in complex terrain - a review
    Bradley, Stuart
    Strehz, Alexander
    Emeis, Stefan
    [J]. METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2015, 24 (06) : 547 - 555
  • [7] Brower M.C., 2012, WIND RESOURCEASSESSM
  • [8] Canadillas B., 2011, DEWI MAGAZIN, V38
  • [9] Boundary-layer anemometry by optical remote sensing for Wind energy applications
    Emeis, Stefan
    Harris, Michael
    Banta, Robert M.
    [J]. METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2007, 16 (04) : 337 - 347
  • [10] Foussekis D., 2009, P EWEA EUR WIND EN C