Research impact and productivity of Southeast Asian countries in language and linguistics

被引:26
作者
Barrot, Jessie S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ, 551 MF Jhocson St, Manila, Philippines
关键词
Bibliometrics; Research performance; Research productivity; Linguistics; Language research; Southeast Asia; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; H-INDEX; CITATION; WEB; PERFORMANCE; SCIENCE; SCOPUS; UNIVERSITIES; FIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-016-2163-3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
It has been observed that Southeast Asian countries and universities have ranked poorly in global research productivity and impact. The same is true for the field of language and linguistics. Some studies revealed that productivity and citation patterns in this field are lower compared to other fields of study. Thus, this study sought to examine the research performance of SEA countries and universities in the field of language and linguistics for efficient policy-making. The research performance of each SEA country and university was assessed through Scopus database using the following bibliometric indicators: total number of publications (P), total number of citations excluding self-citations (C), citations per publication (CPP), percent of non-cited articles (%PNC), and h-index. Findings revealed that SEA countries have only produced almost 2 % of all published articles in language and linguistics and around 1 % share in overall worldwide field citations. Interestingly, both the SEA countries and universities exhibit a trend toward increasing their yearly research productivity and citations. However, research productivity and citations in the field of language and linguistics are dominated by selected universities in each country particularly in Brunei, Singapore, Malaysia, and the Philippines. This study has implications for research policy-making and future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   The dispersion of research performance within and between universities as a potential indicator of the competitive intensity in higher education systems [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
Cicero, Tindaro ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (02) :155-168
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INT TRAD HIGH ED OPP
[3]   A bibliometric analysis of linguistics in web of science [J].
Arik, Engin .
JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRIC RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (01) :20-28
[4]   How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Marx, Werner .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 98 (01) :487-509
[5]   A Hirsch-type index for journals [J].
Braun, Tibor ;
Glanzel, Wolfgang ;
Schubert, Andras .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 69 (01) :169-173
[6]   A comparative study of cross-domain research output and citations: Research impact cubes and binary citation frequencies [J].
Cerovsek, Tomo ;
Mikos, Matjaz .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2014, 8 (01) :147-161
[7]   Accounting research in the Asia-Pacific region: An update [J].
Chan K.C. ;
Tong J.Y. ;
Zhang F.F. .
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2013, 41 (4) :675-694
[8]  
Chen ChiehFeng Chen ChiehFeng, 2010, Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, V2, P79
[9]  
Deem R., 2008, HIGH EDUC POLICY, V21, P83, DOI DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.HEP.8300179
[10]   Research Productivity Among Nations [J].
DeMaria, Anthony .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (25) :2460-2462