Frequency selectivity of contralateral residual acoustic hearing in bimodal cochlear implant users, and limitations on the ability to match the pitch of electric and acoustic stimuli

被引:17
作者
Green, Tim [1 ]
Faulkner, Andrew [1 ]
Rosen, Stuart [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London WC1N 1PF, England
关键词
Cochlear implant; bimodal hearing; frequency selectivity; SPEECH RECOGNITION; FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY; OPPOSITE EARS; PERCEPTION; BENEFIT; ADULTS; PLACE; NOISE; AIDS; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.3109/14992027.2011.642010
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the reliability of across-ear, acoustic-electric pitch/timbre comparisons for determining effective characteristic frequencies of cochlear implant electrodes. Study sample: Nine CI users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing. Design: Absolute acoustic thresholds in the unimplanted ear were measured and frequency selectivity was assessed via psychophysical tuning curves. An adjustment method was used to match the percepts elicited by pulse trains on individual electrodes with various acoustic signals (pure tones, narrow-band noises, and bandpass filtered pulse trains). The starting frequency of the acoustic signal was roved and matches were obtained at different loudness levels. Results: Acoustic frequency selectivity varied widely. Two subjects showed clear evidence of frequency selectivity extending above 500 Hz. Only these subjects produced consistent pitch matches over repeated measurements. For other subjects, the acoustic frequency eventually selected tended to correlate with the initially presented frequency. There was limited evidence of level effects and these were inconsistent across subjects and electrodes. Conclusions: Across-modality pitch/timbre matching appears unlikely to provide a generally applicable method for determining the effective characteristic frequencies of cochlear implant electrodes. Frequency selectivity above 500 Hz may be necessary for consistent pitch/timbre matches.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 398
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research Article Effect of Age and Unaided Acoustic Hearing on Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users' Ability to Distinguish Yes/No Statements and Questions
    Buss, Emily
    Richter, Margaret E.
    Sweeney, Victoria N.
    Davis, Amanda G.
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Park, Lisa R.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2024, 67 (06): : 1932 - 1944
  • [32] Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing
    Scheperle, Rachel A.
    Tejani, Viral D.
    Omtvedt, Julia K.
    Brown, Carolyn J.
    Abbas, Paul J.
    Hansen, Marlan R.
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Oleson, Jacob J.
    Ozanne, Marie V.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 350 : 45 - 57
  • [33] The Sound Sensation of Apical Electric Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Contralateral Residual Hearing
    Lazard, Diane S.
    Marozeau, Jeremy
    McDermott, Hugh J.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (06):
  • [34] Trimodal Speech Perception: How Residual Acoustic Hearing Supplements Cochlear-Implant Consonant Recognition in the Presence of Visual Cues
    Sheffield, Benjamin M.
    Schuchman, Gerald
    Bernstein, Joshua G. W.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (03) : E99 - E112
  • [35] Low-Frequency Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Buss, Emily
    Rooth, Meredith A.
    King, English R.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (08): : 2860 - 2871
  • [36] The Inter-Phase Gap Offset Effect as a Measure of Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Acoustic Hearing
    Sijgers, Leanne
    Roosli, Christof
    Bertschinger, Rahel
    Epprecht, Lorenz
    Veraguth, Dorothe
    Dalbert, Adrian
    Huber, Alexander
    Pfiffner, Flurin
    EAR AND HEARING, 2025, 46 (01) : 83 - 97
  • [37] The discrimination of voice cues in simulations of bimodal electro-acoustic cochlear-implant hearing
    Baskent, Deniz
    Luckmann, Annika
    Ceha, Jessy
    Gaudrain, Etienne
    Tamati, Terrin N.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 143 (04) : EL292 - EL297
  • [38] Pleasantness Ratings for Harmonic Intervals With Acoustic and Electric Hearing in Unilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Patients
    Spitzer, Emily R.
    Landsberger, David M.
    Friedmann, David R.
    Galvin, John J., III
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [39] Amount of Frequency Compression in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users Is a Poor Predictor for Audibility and Spatial Hearing
    Sharma, Snandan
    Nogueira, Waldo
    van Opstal, A. John
    Chalupper, Josef
    Mens, Lucas H. M.
    van Wanrooij, Marc M.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2021, 64 (12): : 5000 - 5013
  • [40] Acoustically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recorded From Cochlear Implant Users With Preserved Acoustic Hearing
    Kim, Jeong-Seo
    Brown, Carolyn J.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2023, 44 (05) : 1061 - 1077