Frequency selectivity of contralateral residual acoustic hearing in bimodal cochlear implant users, and limitations on the ability to match the pitch of electric and acoustic stimuli

被引:17
作者
Green, Tim [1 ]
Faulkner, Andrew [1 ]
Rosen, Stuart [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London WC1N 1PF, England
关键词
Cochlear implant; bimodal hearing; frequency selectivity; SPEECH RECOGNITION; FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY; OPPOSITE EARS; PERCEPTION; BENEFIT; ADULTS; PLACE; NOISE; AIDS; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.3109/14992027.2011.642010
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the reliability of across-ear, acoustic-electric pitch/timbre comparisons for determining effective characteristic frequencies of cochlear implant electrodes. Study sample: Nine CI users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing. Design: Absolute acoustic thresholds in the unimplanted ear were measured and frequency selectivity was assessed via psychophysical tuning curves. An adjustment method was used to match the percepts elicited by pulse trains on individual electrodes with various acoustic signals (pure tones, narrow-band noises, and bandpass filtered pulse trains). The starting frequency of the acoustic signal was roved and matches were obtained at different loudness levels. Results: Acoustic frequency selectivity varied widely. Two subjects showed clear evidence of frequency selectivity extending above 500 Hz. Only these subjects produced consistent pitch matches over repeated measurements. For other subjects, the acoustic frequency eventually selected tended to correlate with the initially presented frequency. There was limited evidence of level effects and these were inconsistent across subjects and electrodes. Conclusions: Across-modality pitch/timbre matching appears unlikely to provide a generally applicable method for determining the effective characteristic frequencies of cochlear implant electrodes. Frequency selectivity above 500 Hz may be necessary for consistent pitch/timbre matches.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 398
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function [J].
Baumann, U ;
Nobbe, A .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2006, 213 (1-2) :34-42
[2]   Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations [J].
Blamey, PJ ;
Dooley, GJ ;
Parisi, ES ;
Clark, GM .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1996, 99 (1-2) :139-150
[3]   Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing [J].
Boëx, Colette ;
Baud, Lionel ;
Cosendai, Grégoire ;
Sigrist, Alain ;
Kós, Maria-Izabel ;
Pelizzone, Marco .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 7 (02) :110-124
[4]   Achieving Electric-Acoustic Benefit with a Modulated Tone [J].
Brown, Christopher A. ;
Bacon, Sid P. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2009, 30 (05) :489-493
[5]   Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing [J].
Brown, Christopher A. ;
Bacon, Sid P. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 125 (03) :1658-1665
[6]   Pitch Comparisons between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Normal-hearing Contralateral Ear [J].
Carlyon, Robert P. ;
Macherey, Olivier ;
Frijns, Johan H. M. ;
Axon, Patrick R. ;
Kalkman, Randy K. ;
Boyle, Patrick ;
Baguley, David M. ;
Briggs, John ;
Deeks, John M. ;
Briaire, Jeroen J. ;
Barreau, Xavier ;
Dauman, Rene .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 11 (04) :625-640
[7]   Effect of stimulus level and place of stimulation on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant users [J].
Carlyon, Robert P. ;
Lynch, Catherine ;
Deeks, John M. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 127 (05) :2997-3008
[8]   Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise [J].
Chang, Janice E. ;
Bai, John Y. ;
Zeng, Fan-Gang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 53 (12) :2598-2601
[9]  
Ching T Y C, 2007, Trends Amplif, V11, P161, DOI 10.1177/1084713807304357
[10]   Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears [J].
Ching, TYC ;
Incerti, P ;
Hill, M .
EAR AND HEARING, 2004, 25 (01) :9-21