Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field

被引:29
作者
De Oliveira, Gildasio S., Jr. [1 ]
Jung, Michael [2 ]
Mccaffery, Kirsten J. [3 ]
McCarthy, Robert J. [1 ]
Wolf, Michael S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Readability; Anesthesiology; Websites; HEALTH LITERACY; MORTALITY; SURGEONS; CONSENT; PRINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.02.005
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: The main objective of the current investigation was to assess the readability of Internet-based patient education materials related to the field of anesthesiology. We hypothesized that the majority of patient education materials would not be written according to current recommended readability grade level. Setting: Online patient education materials describing procedures, risks, and management of anesthesia-related topics were identified using the search engine Google (available at www.google.com) using the terms anesthesia, anesthesiology, anesthesia risks, and anesthesia care. Design: Cross-sectional evaluation. Interventions: None. Measurements: Assessments of content readability were performed using validated instruments (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Formulae, the Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, the New Dale-Chall Test, the Fry graph, and the Flesch Reading Ease score). Main Results: Ninety-six Web sites containing Internet patient education materials (IPEMs) were evaluated. The median (interquartile range) readability grade level for all evaluated IPEMs was 13.5 (12.0-14.6). All the evaluated documents were classified at a greater readability level than the current recommended readability grade, P < .001. Readability grades were not significantly different among different IPEM sources. Assessment by the Flesch Reading Ease test classified all but 4 IPEMs as at least fairly difficult to read. Conclusions: Internet-based patient education materials related to the field of anesthesiology are currently written far above the recommended readability grade level. High complexity of written education materials likely limits access of information to millions of American patients. Redesign of online content of Web sites that provide patient education material regarding anesthesia could be an important step in improving access to information for patients with poor health literacy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 405
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A Comparative Analysis of the Quality of Patient Education Materials From Medical Specialties [J].
Agarwal, Nitin ;
Hansberry, David R. ;
Sabourin, Victor ;
Tomei, Krystal L. ;
Prestigiacomo, Charles J. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (13) :1257-1259
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, HLTH LITERACY PRESCR
[3]  
Azu MC, 2012, AM SURGEON, V78, P555
[4]   Health literacy and mortality among elderly persons [J].
Baker, David W. ;
Wolf, Michael S. ;
Feinglass, Joseph ;
Thompson, Jason A. ;
Gazmararian, Julie A. ;
Huang, Jenny .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 167 (14) :1503-1509
[5]   Determinants of a Subject's Decision to Participate in Clinical Anesthesia Research [J].
Balajonda, Naraida ;
Bisanar, Tiffany L. ;
Mathew, Joseph P. ;
Pang, Herbert ;
Voils, Corrine I. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 116 (02) :448-454
[6]   The Future of Primary Care: Transforming Practice [J].
Bodenheimer, Thomas .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (20) :2086-+
[7]  
Cherla DV, 2013, OTOL NEUROTOL, V34, P1349, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829530e5
[8]   Treating the Internet-informed Patient [J].
D'Ambrosia, Robert D. .
ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 32 (01) :13-13
[9]   Consent, assent, and the importance of risk stratification [J].
Dennehy, L. ;
White, S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 109 (01) :40-46
[10]   Readability Assessment of Online Ophthalmic Patient Information [J].
Edmunds, Matthew R. ;
Barry, Robert J. ;
Denniston, Alastair K. .
JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 131 (12) :1610-1616