Positron-Emission Tomography Scan-Directed Chemoradiation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: No Benefit for a Change in Chemotherapy in Positron-Emission Tomography Nonresponders

被引:14
|
作者
Greally, Megan [1 ]
Chou, Joanne F. [2 ]
Molena, Daniela [3 ]
Rusch, Valerie W. [3 ]
Bains, Manjit S. [3 ]
Park, Bernard J. [3 ]
Wu, Abraham J. [4 ]
Goodman, Karyn A. [5 ]
Kelsen, David P. [1 ]
Janjigian, Yelena Y. [1 ]
Ilson, David H. [1 ]
Ku, Geoffrey Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Gastrointestinal Oncol Serv, 300 E 66th St,Rm 1405, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Epidemiol & Biostat, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Thorac Surg Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Dept Radiat Oncol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Positron-emission tomography; Induction chemotherapy; Positron-emission tomography nonresponders; Chemoradiation; LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; PET; SURGERY; CANCER; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADENOCARCINOMA; THERAPY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.152
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Preoperative or definitive chemoradiation is an accepted treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The MUNICON study showed that positron-emission tomography (PET) response following induction chemotherapy was predictive of outcomes in patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. We evaluated the predictive value of PET following induction chemotherapy in ESCC patients and assessed the impact of changing chemotherapy during radiation in PET nonresponders. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with locally advanced ESCC who received induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation; all patients had a PET before and after induction chemotherapy. Survival was calculated from date of repeat PET using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Results: Of 111 patients, 70 (63%) were PET responders (defined as a 35% or more decrease in maximum standard uptake value) to induction chemotherapy. PET responders received the same chemotherapy during radiation. Of 41 PET nonresponders, 16 continued with the same chemotherapy and 25 were changed to alternative chemotherapy with radiation. Median progression-free survival (70.1 months versus 7.1 months, p < 0.01) and overall survival (84.8 months versus 17.2 months, p< 0.01) were improved for PET responders versus nonresponders. Median progression-free survival and overall survival for PET nonresponders who changed chemotherapy versus those who did not were 6.4 months versus 8.3 months (p = 0.556) and 14.1 versus 17.2 months (p = 0.81), respectively. Conclusions: PET after induction chemotherapy highly predicts for outcomes in ESCC patients who receive chemoradiation. However, our results suggest that PET nonresponders do not benefit from changing chemotherapy during radiation. Future trials should use PET nonresponse after induction chemotherapy to identify poor prognosis patients for novel therapies. (C) 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 546
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    TERPOGOSSIAN, MM
    RAICHLE, ME
    SOBEL, BE
    SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1980, 243 (04) : 170 - 181
  • [2] Positron-emission tomography
    Ollinger, JM
    Fessler, JA
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 1997, 14 (01) : 43 - 55
  • [3] POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY OF THE HEART
    SCHWAIGER, M
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 143 (03): : 371 - 372
  • [4] Positron-emission tomography in urooncology
    Maurer, T.
    Kuebler, H.
    Gschwend, J. E.
    Eiber, M.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (07): : 983 - 991
  • [5] POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AND CARDIOMYOPATHY
    SOBEL, BE
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 68 : S24 - S28
  • [6] New Possibilities of Positron-Emission Tomography
    A. N. Volobuev
    Technical Physics, 2018, 63 : 141 - 147
  • [7] Positron-emission tomography in gynaecologic malignancies
    Maffione, Anna Margherita
    Piva, Michela
    Tsamita, Charoula Stavroula
    Nanni, Cristina
    Castellucci, Paolo
    Ambrosini, Valentina
    Lopci, Egesta
    Musto, Alessandra
    Rampin, Lucia
    Grassetto, Gaia
    Marzola, Maria Cristina
    Massaro, Arianna
    Cracco, Elena
    Al-Nahhas, Adil
    Fanti, Stefano
    Rubello, Domenico
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2009, 280 (04) : 521 - 528
  • [8] Future of positron-emission tomography in oncology
    Niederhuber, JE
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (03) : 324 - 325
  • [9] New Possibilities of Positron-Emission Tomography
    Volobuev, A. N.
    TECHNICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 63 (01) : 141 - 147
  • [10] Positron-emission tomography in gynaecologic malignancies
    Anna Margherita Maffione
    Michela Piva
    Charoula Stavroula Tsamita
    Cristina Nanni
    Paolo Castellucci
    Valentina Ambrosini
    Egesta Lopci
    Alessandra Musto
    Lucia Rampin
    Gaia Grassetto
    Maria Cristina Marzola
    Arianna Massaro
    Elena Cracco
    Adil Al-Nahhas
    Stefano Fanti
    Domenico Rubello
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009, 280 : 521 - 528