The Relationship of Intravenous Dextrose Administration During Emergence from Anesthesia to Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:18
作者
Patel, Parul [1 ]
Meineke, Minhthy N. [1 ]
Rasmussen, Thomas [1 ]
Anderson, Donald L. [1 ]
Brown, Jennifer [2 ]
Siddighi, Sam [3 ]
Applegate, Richard L., II [1 ]
机构
[1] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Nursing, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[3] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
关键词
SIMPLIFIED RISK SCORE; AMBULATORY SURGERY; FLUID; LAPAROSCOPY; MANAGEMENT; INFUSION; OUTCOMES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e318292ed5f
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) may occur despite antiemetic prophylaxis and is associated with unanticipated hospital admission, financial impact, and patient dissatisfaction. Previous studies have shown variable impact of IV dextrose on PONV. We sought to determine the relationship of IV dextrose administered during emergence from anesthesia to PONV. METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Adult female ASA physical status I and II nondiabetic patients scheduled for outpatient gynecologic, urologic, or breast surgery were randomly assigned to infusion of 250 mL lactated Ringer's solution (group P; n = 75) or dextrose 5% in lactated Ringer's solution (group D; n = 87) over 2 hours beginning with surgical closing. Blood glucose was determined using a point-of-care device before transfer to the operating room, in the operating room immediately before study fluid infusion, and in the recovery room after study fluid infusion. No antiemetics were given before arrival in the recovery room. PONV scores were recorded at 0, 30, 60, and 120 minutes and 24 hours after arrival in the recovery room. Medication administration was recorded. RESULTS: Data from 162 patients with normal baseline blood glucose were analyzed. There were no significant intergroup differences in demographics, history of PONV, or tobacco use. There was no significant intergroup difference in PONV during the first 2 hours after anesthesia (group D 52.9% vs group P 46.7%; difference, 6.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.2% to 21.6%; P = 0.43). Patients in groups D or P who developed PONV within 2 hours of anesthesia had similar number of severity scores 1 during recovery stay (1.5 vs 1.0; difference, 0; 95% CI, 0%-0%; P = 0.93); and similar proportions of: PONV onset within 30 minutes of recovery room arrival (65.2% vs 57.1%; difference, 8.1%; 95% CI, -13.1% to 28.8%; P = 0.46); more than 1 dose of antiemetic medication (56.5% vs 62.9%; difference, 6.3%; 95% CI, -26.9% to 15.1%; P= 0.65); or more than 1 class of antiemetic medication (50.0% vs 54.3%; difference, 4.3%; 95% CI, -25.5% to 17.4%; P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of dextrose during emergence from anesthesia was not associated with a difference in the incidence of PONV exceeding 20% or in the severity of PONV in the first 2 hours after anesthesia. The relationship between PONV and the optimal dose and timing of IV dextrose administration remains unclear and may warrant further study.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 42
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Effect of supplemental pre-operative fluid on postoperative nausea and vomiting [J].
Ali, SZ ;
Taguchi, A ;
Holtmann, B ;
Kurz, A .
ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 58 (08) :780-784
[2]  
[Anonymous], NATL HLTH STAT REPOR
[3]   Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Kranke, P ;
Eberhart, LHJ ;
Roos, A ;
Roewer, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (02) :234-240
[4]   A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting -: Conclusions from cross-validations between two centers [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Läärä, E ;
Koivuranta, M ;
Greim, CA ;
Roewer, N .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (03) :693-700
[5]   A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Korttila, K ;
Abdalla, M ;
Kerger, H ;
Turan, A ;
Vedder, I ;
Zernak, C ;
Danner, K ;
Jokela, R ;
Pocock, SJ ;
Trenkler, S ;
Kredel, M ;
Biedler, A ;
Sessler, DI ;
Roewer, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (24) :2441-2451
[6]   Comparison of surgical site and patient's history with a simplified risk score for the prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Kranke, P ;
Eberhart, LHJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 59 (11) :1078-1082
[7]   How to study postoperative nausea and vomiting [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Roewer, N ;
Korttila, K .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 46 (08) :921-928
[8]   Assessment of postoperative nausea using a visual analogue scale [J].
Boogaerts, JG ;
Vanacker, E ;
Seidel, L ;
Albert, A ;
Bardiau, FM .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 44 (04) :470-474
[9]   RETRACTED: Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (Retracted Article) [J].
Carlisle, J. B. ;
Stevenson, C. A. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (03)
[10]   Factors contributing to a prolonged stay after ambulatory surgery [J].
Chung, F ;
Mezei, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (06) :1352-1359