Optimization of stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment planning using a multicriteria optimization algorithm

被引:3
|
作者
Ghandour, Sarah [1 ]
Cosinschi, Adrien [1 ]
Mazouni, Zohra [1 ]
Pachoud, Marc [1 ]
Matzinger, Oscar [1 ]
机构
[1] Riviera Chablais Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Ctr Canc, Ave Prairie 1, CH-1800 Vevey, Switzerland
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK | 2016年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
SBRT; MCO; DMPO; VMAT; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; SIDED BREAST-CANCER; CELL LUNG-CANCER; RADIATION-THERAPY; LIVER METASTASES; PNEUMONITIS; IMRT; PREDICTORS; EFFICIENCY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.04.001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To provide high-quality and efficient dosi-metric planning for various types of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for tumor treatment using a multicriteria optimization (MCO) technique fine-tuned with direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO). Methods and materials: Eighteen patients with lung (n =11), liver (n = 5) or adrenal cell cancer (n = 2) were treated using SBRT in our clinic between December 2014 and June 2015. Plans were generated using the RayStation (TM) Treatment Planning System (TPS) with the VMAT technique. Optimal deliverable SBRT plans were first generated using an MCO algorithm to find a well-balanced tradeoff between tumor control and normal tissue sparing in an efficient treatment planning time. Then, the deliverable plan was post-processed using the MCO solution as the starting point for the DMPO algorithm to improve the dose gradient around the planning target volume (PTV) while maintaining the clinician's priorities. The dosimetric quality of the plans was evaluated using dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters, which account for target coverage and the sparing of healthy tissue, as well as the CI100 and CI50 conformity indexes. Results: Using a combination of the MCO and DMPO algorithms showed that the treatment plans were clinically optimal and conformed to all organ risk dose volume constraints reported in the literature, with a computation time of approximately one hour. The coverage of the PTV (D99% and D95%) and sparing of organs at risk (OAR) were similar between the MCO and MCO + DMPO plans, with no significant differences (p > 0.05) for all the SBRT plans. The average CI100 and CI50 values using MCO + DMPO were significantly better than those with MCO alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The MCO technique allows for convergence on an optimal solution for SBRT within an efficient planning time. The combination of the MCO and DMPO techniques yields a better dose gradient, especially for lung tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 370
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Compressed radiotherapy treatment planning: A new paradigm for rapid and high-quality treatment planning optimization
    Tefagh, Mojtaba
    Jhanwar, Gourav
    Zarepisheh, Masoud
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025,
  • [32] Dosimetric comparison of robotic- and LINAC-based treatment of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Acar, Hilal
    Yazici, Omer
    Unal, Dilek
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2022, 47 (04) : 348 - 355
  • [33] Evaluation of dose prediction error and optimization convergence error in four-dimensional inverse planning of robotic stereotactic lung radiotherapy
    Chan, Mark K. H.
    Kwong, Dora L. W.
    Tong, Anthony
    Tam, Eric
    Ng, Sherry C. Y.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (04): : 182 - 195
  • [34] Treatment planning system and dose delivery accuracy in extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy using Elekta body frame
    Dawod, Tamer
    Bremer, Michael
    Karstens, Johann H.
    Werner, Martin
    POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2010, 16 (01): : 23 - 34
  • [35] Clinical introduction of Monte Carlo treatment planning for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Miura, Hideharu
    Masai, Norihisa
    Oh, Ryoong-Jin
    Shiomi, Hiroya
    Yamada, Kouichi
    Sasaki, Junichi
    Inoue, Toshihiko
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (01): : 38 - 46
  • [36] A DVH-guided IMRT optimization algorithm for automatic treatment planning and adaptive radiotherapy replanning
    Zarepisheh, Masoud
    Long, Troy
    Li, Nan
    Tian, Zhen
    Romeijn, H. Edwin
    Jia, Xun
    Jiang, Steve B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06)
  • [37] Homogenized blocked arcs for multicriteria optimization of radiotherapy: Analytical and numerical solutions
    Fenwick, John D.
    Pardo-Montero, Juan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (05) : 2194 - 2206
  • [38] Intra-arc binary collimation algorithm for the optimization of stereotactic radiotherapy treatment of multiple metastases with multiple prescriptions
    MacDonald, R. Lee
    Thomas, Christopher G.
    Ward, Lucy
    Syme, Alasdair
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (12) : 5597 - 5607
  • [39] OAR Dose Distribution Prediction and gEUD Based Automatic Treatment Planning Optimization for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
    Jia, Qiyuan
    Li, Yongbao
    Wu, Aiqian
    Guo, Futong
    Qi, Mengke
    Mai, Yanhua
    Kong, Fantu
    Zhen, Xin
    Zhou, Linghong
    Song, Ting
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 141426 - 141437
  • [40] Trajectory optimization in radiotherapy using sectioning (TORUS)
    Locke, Christopher Barry
    Bush, Karl Kenneth
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (07) : 3375 - 3392