Optimization of stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment planning using a multicriteria optimization algorithm

被引:3
|
作者
Ghandour, Sarah [1 ]
Cosinschi, Adrien [1 ]
Mazouni, Zohra [1 ]
Pachoud, Marc [1 ]
Matzinger, Oscar [1 ]
机构
[1] Riviera Chablais Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Ctr Canc, Ave Prairie 1, CH-1800 Vevey, Switzerland
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK | 2016年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
SBRT; MCO; DMPO; VMAT; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; SIDED BREAST-CANCER; CELL LUNG-CANCER; RADIATION-THERAPY; LIVER METASTASES; PNEUMONITIS; IMRT; PREDICTORS; EFFICIENCY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.04.001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To provide high-quality and efficient dosi-metric planning for various types of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for tumor treatment using a multicriteria optimization (MCO) technique fine-tuned with direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO). Methods and materials: Eighteen patients with lung (n =11), liver (n = 5) or adrenal cell cancer (n = 2) were treated using SBRT in our clinic between December 2014 and June 2015. Plans were generated using the RayStation (TM) Treatment Planning System (TPS) with the VMAT technique. Optimal deliverable SBRT plans were first generated using an MCO algorithm to find a well-balanced tradeoff between tumor control and normal tissue sparing in an efficient treatment planning time. Then, the deliverable plan was post-processed using the MCO solution as the starting point for the DMPO algorithm to improve the dose gradient around the planning target volume (PTV) while maintaining the clinician's priorities. The dosimetric quality of the plans was evaluated using dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters, which account for target coverage and the sparing of healthy tissue, as well as the CI100 and CI50 conformity indexes. Results: Using a combination of the MCO and DMPO algorithms showed that the treatment plans were clinically optimal and conformed to all organ risk dose volume constraints reported in the literature, with a computation time of approximately one hour. The coverage of the PTV (D99% and D95%) and sparing of organs at risk (OAR) were similar between the MCO and MCO + DMPO plans, with no significant differences (p > 0.05) for all the SBRT plans. The average CI100 and CI50 values using MCO + DMPO were significantly better than those with MCO alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The MCO technique allows for convergence on an optimal solution for SBRT within an efficient planning time. The combination of the MCO and DMPO techniques yields a better dose gradient, especially for lung tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 370
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An efficient inverse radiotherapy planning method for VMAT using quadratic programming optimization
    Hoegele, W.
    Loeschel, R.
    Merkle, N.
    Zygmanski, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (01) : 444 - 454
  • [22] Optimization of image reconstruction technique for respiratory-gated lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment planning using four-dimensional CT: a phantom study
    Yasue, Kenji
    Fuse, Hiraku
    Takaoka, Minori
    Miyakawa, Shin
    Koori, Norikazu
    Takahashi, Masato
    Shinoda, Kazuya
    Ikoma, Hideaki
    Fujisaki, Tatsuya
    Abe, Shinji
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 18 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [23] Plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor
    Watcharawipha, Anirut
    Chakrabandhu, Somvilai
    Kongsa, Anupong
    Tippanya, Damrongsak
    Chitapanarux, Imjai
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (07):
  • [24] Development and clinical validation of a robust knowledge-based planning model for stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment of centrally located lung tumors
    Visak, Justin
    McGarry, Ronald C.
    Randall, Marcus E.
    Pokhrel, Damodar
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (01): : 146 - 155
  • [25] Dose escalation with stereotactic body radiotherapy for cervical cancer treatment
    Turna, Menekse
    Rzazade, Rashad
    Kucukmorkoc, Esra
    Kucuk, Nadir
    Canoglu, Mehmet Dogu
    Caglar, Hale Basak
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [26] The Evolution (and Future) of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Oligometastatic Disease
    Onderdonk, Benjamin E.
    Gutiontov, Stanley I.
    Chmura, Steven J.
    HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 34 (01) : 307 - +
  • [27] Sparing the surgical area with stereotactic body radiotherapy for combined treatment of spinal metastases: a treatment planning study
    Versteeg, A. L.
    Hes, J.
    van der Velden, J. M.
    Eppinga, W.
    Kasperts, N.
    Verkooijen, H. M.
    van Vulpen, M.
    Oner, F. C.
    Seravalli, E.
    Verlaan, J. J.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2019, 58 (02) : 251 - 256
  • [28] Similar-Case-Based Optimization of Beam Arrangements in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Assisting Treatment Planners
    Magome, Taiki
    Arimura, Hidetaka
    Shioyama, Yoshiyuki
    Nakamura, Katsumasa
    Honda, Hiroshi
    Hirata, Hideki
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013
  • [29] Optimal selection of optimization bolus thickness in planning of VMAT breast radiotherapy treatments
    Rossi, Maija
    Boman, Eeva
    Kapanen, Mika
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2019, 44 (03) : 266 - 273
  • [30] Monitor unit optimization in stereotactic body radiotherapy for small peripheral non-small cell lung cancer patients
    Huang, Bao-Tian
    Lin, Zhu
    Lin, Pei-Xian
    Lu, Jia-Yang
    Chen, Chuang-Zhen
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5