Shifts in National Rates of Inpatient Prolapse Surgery Emphasize Current Coding Inadequacies

被引:23
作者
Bradley, Sarah L. [1 ]
Weidner, Alison C. [1 ]
Siddiqui, Nazema Y. [1 ]
Gandhi, Mihir P. [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Jennifer M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Singapore Clin Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Duke NUS Grad Med Sch, Singapore, Singapore
来源
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY | 2011年 / 17卷 / 04期
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; surgical procedures; trends; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; FLOOR DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182254cf1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess national rates, types, and routes of inpatient surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States in 1998 compared to those in 2007. Methods: We used the 1998 and 2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, which represents a stratified, random sample of discharge data from US hospitals. We included women 20 years and older who underwent surgery for prolapse based on diagnosis and procedure codes of the International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification. We calculated the number of women undergoing surgery each year and incidence rates. Results: The total number of women undergoing prolapse surgeries was 92,503 in 1998 versus 113,646 in 2007. The incidence rate of surgery increased slightly, from 90.8 to 100.9 per 100,000 women, respectively. The most common procedure was hysterectomy, representing approximately half of prolapse surgeries in 1998 and 2007. Suspension procedures accounted for 18.8% of procedures in 2007, an increase from 6.1% in 1998. Surgeries performed via a minimally invasive route increased from 4.8% in 1998 to 9.4% in 2007. However, it was difficult to determine the route for many procedures based on current ICD-9 codes. There were also no codes that specifically designated mesh kit procedures or minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies. Conclusions: During the last decade, the rate of inpatient prolapse surgery has slightly increased. The proportion of suspension procedures has increased; however, it is difficult to determine the route of these procedures based on current ICD-9 codes. These findings emphasize that ICD-9 procedure codes have not kept up with changes in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 208
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [11] Klein RJ., 2001, AGE ADJUSTMENT USING
  • [12] Effect of Weight Change on Natural History of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Kudish, Bela I.
    Iglesia, Cheryl B.
    Sokol, Robert J.
    Cochrane, Barbara
    Richter, Holly E.
    Larson, Joseph
    HendriX, Susan L.
    Howard, Barbara V.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [13] The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: Current observations and future projections
    Luber, KM
    Boero, S
    Choe, JY
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (07) : 1496 - 1503
  • [14] Use of vaginal mesh in the face of recent FDA warnings and litigation
    Mucowski, Sara J.
    Jurnalov, Catalin
    Phelps, John Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (02) : 103.e1 - 103.e4
  • [15] Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women
    Nygaard, Ingrid
    Barber, Matthew D.
    Burgio, Kathryn L.
    Kenton, Kimberly
    Meikle, Susan
    Schaffer, Joseph
    Spino, Cathie
    Whitehead, William E.
    Wu, Jennifer
    Brody, Debra J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (11): : 1311 - 1316
  • [16] Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence
    Olsen, AL
    Smith, VJ
    Bergstrom, JO
    Colling, JC
    Clark, AL
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (04) : 501 - 506
  • [17] Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors
    Samuelsson, EC
    Victor, FTA
    Tibblin, G
    Svärdsudd, KF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (02) : 299 - 305
  • [18] Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States
    Subak, LL
    Waetjen, LE
    van den Eeden, S
    Thom, DH
    Vittinghoff, E
    Brown, JS
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (04) : 646 - 651