Having the Right Attitude: How Attitude Impacts Trust Repair in Human-Robot Interaction

被引:11
作者
Esterwood, Connor [1 ]
Robert, Lionel P., Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Inst Robot, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 17TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI '22) | 2022年
关键词
Human-Robot Interaction; Trust Repair; Attitude; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; AUTOMATION;
D O I
10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889535
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Robot co-workers, like human co-workers, make mistakes that undermine trust. Yet, trust is just as important in promoting human-robot collaboration as it is in promoting human-human collaboration. In addition, individuals can significantly differ in their attitudes toward robots, which can also impact or hinder their trust in robots. To better understand how individual attitude can influence trust repair strategies, we propose a theoretical model that draws from the theory of cognitive dissonance. To empirically verify this model, we conducted a between-subjects experiment with 100 participants assigned to one of four repair strategies (apologies, denials, explanations, or promises) over three trust violations. Individual attitudes did moderate the efficacy of repair strategies and this effect differed over successive trust violations. Specifically, repair strategies were most effective relative to individual attitude during the second of the three trust violations, and promises were the trust repair strategy most impacted by an individual's attitude.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 341
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]   Applied ontologies and standards for service robots [J].
Haidegger, Tamas ;
Barreto, Marcos ;
Goncalves, Paulo ;
Habib, Maki K. ;
Ragavan, Sampath Kumar Veera ;
Li, Howard ;
Vaccarella, Alberto ;
Perrone, Roberta ;
Prestes, Edson .
ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2013, 61 (11) :1215-1223
[22]  
Hughes J., 2020, REGHELPER HELPER FUN
[23]   The Apple Does Fall Far from the Tree: User Separation of a System from its Developers in Human-Automation Trust Repair [J].
Jensen, Theodore ;
Albayram, Yusuf ;
Khan, Mohammad Maifi Hasan ;
Al Fahim, Md Abdullah ;
Buck, Ross ;
Coman, Emil .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 ACM DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DIS 2019), 2019, :1071-1082
[24]   The Measurement of the Propensity to Trust Automation [J].
Jessup, Sarah A. ;
Schneider, Tamera R. ;
Alarcon, Gene M. ;
Ryan, Tyler J. ;
Capiola, August .
VIRTUAL, AUGMENTED AND MIXED REALITY: APPLICATIONS AND CASE STUDIES, VAMR 2019, PT II, 2019, 11575 :476-489
[25]   When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation [J].
Kim, PH ;
Dirks, KT ;
Cooper, CD ;
Ferrin, DL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2006, 99 (01) :49-65
[26]   Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations [J].
Kim, PH ;
Ferrin, DL ;
Cooper, CD ;
Dirks, KT .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (01) :104-118
[27]  
Kohn Spencer C., 2019, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, V63, P222, DOI 10.1177/1071181319631381
[28]  
Kohn Spencer C., 2018, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, V62, P1108, DOI 10.1177/1541931218621254
[29]   Trust repair in human-agent teams: the effectiveness of explanations and expressing regret [J].
Kox, E. S. ;
Kerstholt, J. H. ;
Hueting, T. F. ;
de Vries, P. W. .
AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 35 (02)
[30]   Repairing and Enhancing Trust: Approaches to Reducing Organizational Trust Deficits [J].
Kramer, Roderick M. ;
Lewicki, Roy J. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2010, 4 :245-277