A Clinically Meaningful Interpretation of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II and III Data

被引:8
作者
Cronin, Paul [1 ]
Dwamena, Ben A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, B1 132G Taubman Ctr 5302,1500 East Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] VA Ann Arbor Hlth Care Syst, Nucl Med Serv, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
Clinical prediction rule; computed tomography; CT pulmonary angiography; CT venography; likelihood ratios; lung; magnetic resonance angiography; magnetic resonance venography; prevalence; pretest and posttest probability; pulmonary artery; pulmonary embolism; sensitivity and specificity; tomography; venous thrombosis; x-ray computed; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; FAMILY-PHYSICIANS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; PRIMARY-CARE; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETY; RECOMMENDATIONS; PROBABILITY; ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: This study aimed to calculate the multiple-level likelihood ratios (LRs) and posttest probabilities for a positive, indeterminate, or negative test result for multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography (MDCTPA) +/- computed tomography venography (CTV) and magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography (MRPA) +/- magnetic resonance venography (MRV) for each clinical probability level (two-, three-, and four-level) for the nine most commonly used clinical prediction rules (CPRs) (Wells, Geneva, Miniati, and Charlotte). The study design is a review of observational studies with critical review of multiple cohort studies. The settings are acute care, emergency room care, and ambulatory care (inpatients and outpatients). Materials and Methods: Data were used to estimate pulmonary embolism (PE) pretest probability for each of the most commonly used CPRs at each probability level. Multiple-level LRs (positive, indeterminate, negative test) were generated and used to calculate posttest probabilities for MDCTPA, MDCTPA + CTV, MRPA, and MRPA + MRV from sensitivity and specificity results from Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II and PIOPED III for each clinical probability level for each CPR. Nomograms were also created. Results: The LRs for a positive test result were higher for MRPA compared to MDCTPA without venography (76 vs 20) and with venography (42 vs 18). LRs for a negative test result were lower for MDCTPA compared to MRPA without venography (0.18 vs 0.22) and with venography (0.12 vs 0.15). In the three-level Wells score, the pretest clinical probability of PE for a low, moderate, and high clinical probability score is 5.7, 23, and 49. The posttest probability for an initially low clinical probability PE for a positive, indeterminate, and negative test result, respectively, for MDCTPA is 54, 5 and 1; for MDCTPA + CTV is 52, 2, and 0.7; for MRPA is 82, 6, and 1; and for MRPA + MRV is 72, 3, and 1; for an initially moderate clinical probability PE for MDCTPA is 86, 22, and 5; for MDCTPA + CTV is 85, 10, and 4; for MRPA is 96, 25, and 6; and for MRPA + MRV is 93, 14, and 4; and for an initially high clinical probability of PE for MDCTPA is 95, 47, and 15; for MDCTPA + CTV is 95, 27, and 10; for MRPA is 99, 52, and 17; and for MRPA + MRV is 98, 34, and 13. Conclusions: For a positive test result, LRs were considerably higher for MRPA compared to MDCTPA. However, both a positive MRPA and MDCTPA have LRs >10 and therefore can confirm the presence of PE. Performing venography reduced the LR for a positive and negative test for both MDCTPA and MRPA. The nomograms give posttest probabilities for a positive, indeterminate, or negative test result for MDCTPA and MRPA (with and without venography) for each clinical probability level for each of the CPR.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 572
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios
    Bowden, Stephen C.
    Loring, David W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 15 (05) : 769 - 776
  • [2] Campbell IA, 2003, THORAX, V58, P470
  • [3] Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ceriani, E.
    Combescure, C.
    Le Gal, G.
    Nendaz, M.
    Perneger, T.
    Bounameaux, H.
    Perrier, A.
    Righini, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2010, 8 (05) : 957 - 970
  • [4] NATURAL-HISTORY OF PULMONARY-EMBOLISM
    DALEN, JE
    ALPERT, JS
    [J]. PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 1975, 17 (04) : 259 - 270
  • [5] DIAGNOSING PULMONARY-EMBOLISM USING CLINICAL FINDINGS
    HOELLERICH, VL
    WIGTON, RS
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 146 (09) : 1699 - 1704
  • [6] Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: A Multicenter US study
    Kline, JA
    Nelson, RD
    Jackson, RE
    Courtney, DM
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 39 (02) : 144 - 152
  • [7] Use of a clinical decision rule in combination with D-dimer concentration in diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism -: A prospective management study
    Kruip, MJHA
    Slob, MJ
    Schijen, JHEM
    van der Heul, C
    Büller, HR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 162 (14) : 1631 - 1635
  • [8] A structured clinical model for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism
    Miniati, M
    Monti, S
    Bottai, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 114 (03) : 173 - 179
  • [9] Accuracy of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
    Miniati, M
    Prediletto, R
    Formichi, B
    Marini, C
    Di Ricco, C
    Tonelli, L
    Allescia, C
    Pistolesi, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (03) : 864 - 871
  • [10] THOUGHTS ON IMMEDIATE CARE - PULMONARY-EMBOLISM - PROPHYLAXIS DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT
    PRICE, DG
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1976, 31 (07) : 925 - 932