Laparoscopic versus open surgery for pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Fu, Sheng-Qiang [1 ]
Wang, Si-Yuan [1 ]
Chen, Qiang [1 ]
Liu, Yu-Tang [1 ]
Li, Zhi-Long [1 ]
Sun, Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Open; Pheochromocytoma; OPEN ADRENALECTOMY; RESECTION; QUALITY; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-020-00824-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Surgical resection is the main treatment for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). Although open surgery (OS) has been shown to be safe and feasible, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for PHEO remain controversial due to the uncertain effects of pneumoperitoneum on haemodynamics and the complexity of the tumour itself. This study was performed to compare the treatment outcomes of OS with those of LS for patients with PHEO. Methods A systematic search through November 11, 2019, was conducted. All studies comparing outcomes of LS and OS for PHEO were included according to eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software, version 5.3, and STATA software, version 12.0. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results Fourteen studies involving 626 patients were included in this meta-analysis. LS was associated with lower rates of intraoperative haemodynamic instability (IHD) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.00,P = 0.05], less intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = - 115.27 ml, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 128.54 to - 101.99,P < 0.00001], lower blood transfusion rates [OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.52,P < 0.00001], earlier ambulation (WMD = - 1.57 d, 95% CI: - 1.97 to - 1.16,P < 0.00001) and food intake (WMD = - 0.98 d, 95% CI: - 1.36 to - 0.59,P < 0.00001), shorter drainage tube indwelling time (WMD = - 0.51 d, 95% CI: - 0.96 to - 0.07,P = 0.02) and postoperative stay (WMD = - 3.17 d, 95% CI: - 4.76 to - 1.58,P < 0.0001), and lower overall complication rates (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.88,P = 0.01). However, no significant differences in operative time, postoperative blood pressure control, rates of severe complications, postoperative hypotension or cardiovascular disease (CVD) were found between the two groups. Conclusions LS is safe and effective for PHEO resection. Compared with OS, LS caused less IHD, providing an equal chance to cure hypertension while also yielding a faster and better postoperative recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis
    Sheng-Qiang Fu
    Si-Yuan Wang
    Qiang Chen
    Yu-Tang Liu
    Zhi-Long Li
    Ting Sun
    BMC Surgery, 20
  • [2] Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery in the Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nakanishi, Hayato
    Miangul, Shahid
    Wang, Rongzhi
    El Haddad, Joe
    El Ghazal, Nour
    Abdulsalam, Fatma A.
    Matar, Reem H.
    Than, Christian A.
    Johnson, Benjamin E.
    Chen, Herbert
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (02) : 994 - 1005
  • [3] Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Omer Aziz
    Vasilis Constantinides
    Paris P. Tekkis
    Thanos Athanasiou
    Sanjay Purkayastha
    Paraskevas Paraskeva
    Ara W. Darzi
    Alexander G. Heriot
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2006, 13 : 413 - 424
  • [4] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Aziz, O
    Constantinides, V
    Tekkis, PP
    Athanasiou, T
    Purkayastha, S
    Paraskeva, P
    Darzi, AW
    Heriot, AG
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) : 413 - 424
  • [5] Open versus laparoscopic surgery in the management of patients with gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nakanishi, Hayato
    Miangul, Shahid
    Oluwaremi, Timothy T.
    Sim, Bernice L.
    Hong, Sam S.
    Than, Christian A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 224 (01) : 348 - 357
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Kuen-Lin
    Lee, Ko-Chao
    Liu, Chia-Cheng
    Chen, Hong-Hwa
    Lu, Chien-Chang
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 34 (03) : 203 - 215
  • [7] A meta-analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer
    Song, Xiao-Jun
    Liu, Zhi-Li
    Zeng, Rong
    Ye, Wei
    Liu, Chang-Wei
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (17)
  • [8] A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery for Gallbladder Cancer
    Karjol, Uday
    Jonnada, Pavan
    Anwar, Ali Zaid
    Chandranath, Ajay
    Cheruku, Sushama
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (SUPPL 2) : 218 - 225
  • [9] Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme
    Spanjersberg, W. R.
    van Sambeeck, J. D. P.
    Bremers, A.
    Rosman, C.
    van Laarhoven, C. J. H. M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (12): : 3443 - 3453
  • [10] Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) vs open adrenalectomy (OA) for pheochromocytoma (PHEO): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jingdong
    Wang, Yaxuan
    Chang, Xueliang
    Han, Zhenwei
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (06): : 991 - 998