Dynamic compliance optimization: Time vs frequency domain strategies

被引:8
|
作者
Venini, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, Via Ferrata 1, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
关键词
Dynamic compliance optimization; H-infinity-norm; Time-domain functionals; Truly-mixed finite-elements; STRUCTURAL TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION; H-INFINITY-NORM; MATERIAL MICROSTRUCTURE; ACCURATE COMPUTATION; DESIGN SENSITIVITIES; LOADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.07.012
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Dynamic compliance (structural and topology) optimization is a topic of active and fertile research carried on by several research groups aiming to extend to the dynamic regime by now well-consolidated approaches for static compliance optimization. Available approaches on this purpose are first divided into time-domain and frequency-domain strategies and then a comparison between the two is performed with respect to actual significance and CPU time of relevant optimal designs. For this paper sake reference is made to the optimal design of viscoelastic thin beams but the approach may be shown to apply with no modifications to other and possibly more complex systems such as 2D and 3D dynamic-compliance topology optimization. By extensive numerical investigations, it is shown that the frequency-domain approach to be preferred over time-domain schemes even though relevant computations happen to be heavier, mainly as far as the computation of the H-infinity-norm of the system transfer function is concerned. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 22
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Frequency and time domain dynamic structural analysis: convergence and causality
    Venancio, F
    Claret, AM
    Barbosa, FS
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2002, 80 (18-19) : 1503 - 1509
  • [22] Output only dynamic identification in time-frequency domain
    De Stefano, A
    Ceravolo, R
    Sabia, D
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2001, : 447 - 452
  • [23] RESPONSE OF GUYED OFFSHORE TOWERS TO STOCHASTIC LOADS - TIME DOMAIN VS FREQUENCY-DOMAIN
    BRYNJOLFSSON, S
    LEONARD, JW
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1988, 10 (02) : 106 - 116
  • [24] Spar topsides-to-hull connection fatigue - Time domain vs. frequency domain
    Luo, MYH
    Wang, JJ
    Lu, RR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH (2003) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 1, 2003, : 280 - 284
  • [25] Time domain vs. frequency domain characterization of aeroelastic forces for bridge deck sections
    Caracoglia, L
    Jones, NP
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2003, 91 (03) : 371 - 402
  • [26] Antenna system measurements using frequency domain reflectometry vs. time domain reflectometry
    Thomas, Steve
    2006 IEEE AUTOTESTCON, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 217 - 223
  • [27] Time- vs. frequency-domain femtosecond surface sum frequency generation
    Roke, S
    Kleyn, AW
    Bonn, M
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 2003, 370 (1-2) : 227 - 232
  • [28] Dynamic consistency test method combining time domain with frequency domain for simulation results
    Hu, Y.-W. (huyuweihyw@yahoo.cn), 2013, Chinese Institute of Electronics (35):
  • [29] A Smooth Bidirectional Evolutionary Structural Optimization of Vibrational Structures for Natural Frequency and Dynamic Compliance
    Teng, Xiaoyan
    Li, Qiang
    Jiang, Xudong
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2023, 135 (03): : 2479 - 2496
  • [30] Time-convolutional network with joint time-frequency domain loss based on arithmetic optimization algorithm for dynamic response reconstruction
    Qu, Guang
    Song, Mingming
    Xin, Gongfeng
    Shang, Zhiqiang
    Sun, Limin
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 321