What Goes into Risk-Neutral Volatility? Empirical Estimates of Risk and Subjective Risk Preferences

被引:1
|
作者
Figlewski, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10003 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT | 2016年 / 43卷 / 01期
关键词
OPTION PRICES; DENSITY; MARKETS; RETURN;
D O I
10.3905/jpm.2016.43.1.029
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Under Black-Scholes (BS) assumptions, empirical volatility and riskneutral volatility are given by a single parameter that captures all aspects of risk. Inverting the model to extract implied volatility from an option's market price gives the market's forecast of future empirical volatility. But real world returns are not lognormal, volatility is stochastic, and arbitrage is limited; thus, option prices embed both the market's estimate of the empirical returns distribution and also investors' risk attitudes, including possibly distinct preferences over different volatilityrelated aspects of the returns process, such as tail risk. All these influences are reflected in the riskneutral density (RND), which can be extracted from option prices without requiring restrictive assumptions from a pricing model. The author computes daily RNDs for the S&P 500 Index over 15 years and finds that riskneutral volatility is strongly influenced both by investors' projections of future realized volatility and by the riskneutralization process. Several significant variables are connected in different ways to realized volatility, such as the daily trading range and tail risk; others reflect risk attitudes, such as the level of investor confidence and the size of recent volatility forecast errors. © 2015 Institutional Investor LLC. All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 42
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条