Evaluating process fidelity during the implementation of Group Antenatal Care in Mexico

被引:5
作者
Fuentes-Rivera, Evelyn [1 ]
Heredia-Pi, Ileana [1 ]
Andrade-Romo, Zafiro [1 ]
Alcalde-Rabanal, Jacqueline [1 ]
Bravo, Lourdes [1 ]
Jurkiewicz, Laurie [2 ]
Darney, Blair G. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Syst Res, Av Univ 655, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico
[2] UCSF, Dept ObGyn & Reprod Sci, SFGH, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, OHSU, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
关键词
CenteringPregnancy; Model fidelity; Mexico; Process fidelity; Group antenatal care; G-ANC; Implementation; PRENATAL-CARE; INTERVENTIONS; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-020-05430-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a group antenatal care (G-ANC) model that has proven beneficial for mothers and their newborns. We conducted a feasibility study beginning in 2016 as part of the Mexican effort to implement G-ANC locally. This study reports on fidelity to the essential elements of CP during its implementation in Mexico. Methods We collected prospective data using a standardized checklist at four primary-care centers that implemented our adapted G-ANC model. We performed a descriptive analysis of fidelity to 28 processes per G-ANC session (71 sessions made up of 10 groups and 129 women across 4 health centers). We calculated fidelity to each process as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals. We present overall results and stratified by health center and by facilitation team. Results Overall fidelity to the G-ANC intervention was 82%, with variability by health center (78-88%). The elements with the highest fidelity were having space for activities such as checking vital signs, conversation in a circle, and medical check-ups (100% each) and the element with the lowest fidelity was using music to enhance privacy (27.3%). Fidelity was not significantly different by center. Conclusions Our study suggests good model fidelity during the implementation of G-ANC in Mexico. Our findings also contribute useful information about where to focus efforts in the future to maintain and improve G-ANC model fidelity.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating antenatal care in Liberia: evidence from the demographic and health survey
    Blackstone, Sarah R.
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 2019, 59 (10) : 1141 - 1154
  • [32] Group antenatal care compared with standard antenatal care for Somali-Swedish women: a historically controlled evaluation of the Hooyo Project
    Ahrne, Malin
    Byrskog, Ulrika
    Essen, Birgitta
    Andersson, Ewa
    Small, Rhonda
    Schytt, Erica
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [33] Implementation of evidence-based antenatal care in Mozambique: a cluster randomized controlled trial: study protocol
    Chavane, Leonardo
    Merialdi, Mario
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    Requejo-Harris, Jennifer
    Bergel, Eduardo
    Aleman, Alicia
    Colomar, Mercedes
    Luisa Cafferata, Maria
    Carbonell, Alicia
    Crahay, Beatrice
    Delvaux, Therese
    Geelhoed, Diederike
    Guelmezoglu, Metin
    Malapende, Celsa Regina
    Melo, Armando
    My Huong Nguyen
    Osman, Nafissa Bique
    Widmer, Mariana
    Temmerman, Marleen
    Althabe, Fernando
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [34] Evaluating the Implementation of Mexico's Health Reform: The Case of Seguro Popular
    Nigenda, Gustavo
    Wirtz, Veronika J.
    Maria Gonzalez-Robledo, Luz
    Reich, Michael R.
    HEALTH SYSTEMS & REFORM, 2015, 1 (03) : 217 - 228
  • [35] The power of peers: an effectiveness evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal
    Poshan Thapa
    Alex Harsha Bangura
    Isha Nirola
    David Citrin
    Bishal Belbase
    Bhawana Bogati
    B. K. Nirmala
    Sonu Khadka
    Lal Kunwar
    Scott Halliday
    Nandini Choudhury
    Al Ozonoff
    Jasmine Tenpa
    Ryan Schwarz
    Mukesh Adhikari
    S. P. Kalaunee
    Sharon Rising
    Duncan Maru
    Sheela Maru
    Reproductive Health, 16
  • [36] Enhanced Antenatal Care: Combining one-to-one and group Antenatal Care models to increase childbirth education and address childbirth fear
    Swift, Emma Marie
    Zoega, Helga
    Stoll, Kathrin
    Avery, Melissa
    Gottfredsdottir, Helga
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2021, 34 (04) : 381 - 388
  • [37] The power of peers: an effectiveness evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal
    Thapa, Poshan
    Bangura, Alex Harsha
    Nirola, Isha
    Citrin, David
    Belbase, Bishal
    Bogati, Bhawana
    Nirmala, B. K.
    Khadka, Sonu
    Kunwar, Lal
    Halliday, Scott
    Choudhury, Nandini
    Ozonoff, Al
    Tenpa, Jasmine
    Schwarz, Ryan
    Adhikari, Mukesh
    Kalaunee, S. P.
    Rising, Sharon
    Maru, Duncan
    Maru, Sheela
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2019, 16 (01)
  • [38] Group Care in the first 1000 days: implementation and process evaluation of contextually adapted antenatal and postnatal group care targeting diverse vulnerable populations in high-, middle- and low-resource settings
    Martens, Nele
    Crone, Mathilde R.
    Hindori-Mohangoo, Ashna
    Hindori, Manodj
    Reis, Ria
    Hoxha, Ilir S.
    Abanga, Jedidia
    Matthews, Shanaaz
    Berry, Lizette
    van der Kleij, Rianne M. J. J.
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    van Damme, Astrid
    Talrich, Florence
    Beeckman, Katrien
    Court, Christine Mc
    Rising, Sharon Schindler
    Billings, Deborah L.
    Rijnders, Marlies
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [39] Antenatal care of pregnant women during pandemic: A phenomenology study
    Sudaryanti, Lestari
    Mardhika, Amellia
    Qona'ah, Arina
    Tyas, Anestasia Pangestu Mei
    Chan, Chong Mei
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 73 (02) : S71 - S75
  • [40] Risk of depression during pregnancy in usual risk antenatal care
    Silva, Monica Maria de Jesus
    Serrano, Tainah Barbosa de Moraes
    Porcel, Giovanna da Silva
    Monteiro, Bruna Borlina
    Clapis, Maria Jose
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2023, 31